Subj : Re: quick question
To   : alt.bbs.synchronet
From : Marshall
Date : Thu Jul 21 2005 02:45 pm

From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet

I just installed SEXYZ protocol for my Synchronet BBS V12.a, and I no longer 
recieve the errors I've been gettting for years and years! It's solid as a 
rock. I tested both BBS and Syncterm and they're both rockin' and rollin, 
with no errors, and acceptable speed.

Marshall



"Time Warrior" <time.warrior@malkaviabbs.com.remove-9if-this> wrote in 
message news:42DD7362.32184.altsync@malkaviabbs.com...
>  To: Marshall
>  Re: Re: quick question
>  By: Marshall to alt.bbs.synchronet on Tue Jul 19 2005 05:26 pm
>
> > Absolutely. SEXYZ is designed to take advantage of TCP/IP protocol, a 32 
> > bit
> > Windows OS, and is a fully (of course) a 32 bit executeable. The "older"
> > Zmodem protocol, is a slow, clunky and finicky zmodem designed for 
> > modems,
> > with all of it's speed hangups, as well as, i think, being a 16 bit Dos
> > app/door. Old = transfer errors, New = no errors at all.
>
> > Trust me. I know.
>
> I haven't had time to play with it yet. How well does it work? (seeing as 
> you
> seem to know first hand) and how much faster / stable is it?
>
> -- 
> .---------------------------------------------------------------.
> | [TiME WaRRiOR] aka [Dave Kelso] AIM: Twar782 | +o Malkavia BBS |
> | www : synchsupport.net - malkaviabbs.com - xpresit.net         |
> | www$: josephsjewelersonline.com - preferedinsurance.com        |
> |    @: time.warrior@malkaviabbs. com                            |
> \______________________________________________________________/
> --- Synchronet 3.12a-Win32 NewsLink 1.76
> *  Malkavia - Chicago, IL - telnet://malkaviabbs.com 


--- Synchronet 3.12b-Win32 NewsLink 1.83

.