Subj : Market Action To : All From : Paul Rogers Date : Mon Aug 29 2005 07:04 pm Content-type: text/plain With Katrina coming ashore and overnight oil futures hitting $70.80/bbl, the market began the day underwater. But by mid-morning, when it seemed Katrina wasn't quite as severe as feared, it surfaced. Then it hugged the line until mid-afternoon, and finally, as oil closed up but well off its highs, prices rallied some. Prices closed up more than half-way to being significant, but volume remained low, -15% below average. Now, the oil pits reacted too quickly to the danger of Katrina, and took relief too quickly. It will take a while to assess the condition of the rigs and the undersea piping ashore. There could be more shocks. This weekend Greenspan suggested we are under considerable threat from the popping of the real-estate bubble. And that means all of us. I agree. Re-fi's have been enriching the public and they've been spending it, but the interest-only and ARM loans are going to put the squeeze to them, and consumers drive 2/3 of the economy. That's going to percolate through the whole economy. It's going to be especially shocking when all the housing buyers who expected to flip their properties in a couple years as a way of getting out from under dangerous loans, find they can't find buyers. Buy high, sell higher on the "Greater Fool" Theory? That sounds like the recent stock market bubble. There are a lot of chickens out there, many of whom are going to come home to roost--as listed recently. A new one is hyper-inflation and strongly increasing interest rates like we saw following the Vietnam War. I still believe we need to begin studying what steps we can take to protect ourselves if things go south, and begin making plans. If an ideolog rather than a pragmatist is appointed as the new Fed Chairman, then I'd begin going in that direction. But the President isn't known for appointing nonideological pragmatists. There are those who claim Greenspan hasn't reacted quick enough to both raise and lower rates, consequently has made the economy worse than it would have been. Really? That's personal opinion, if not ideology. Where's the proof? A controlled experiment can't be done. The physics and mathematics of damped oscillations and feedback loops are especially relevant here, but the critics are more interested in politics than mathematics. I still think we need to understand and use conservative investment strategies, including more diversification. Price Vola- Momen- Volume Oscil- Summ. Change tility tum lator Index -__+ -__+ -__+ -__+ -__+ -__+ _|__ _>__ _|__ _<__ _>__ ___< 08/23 _|__ _>__ _|__ __<_ _>__ ___< 08/24 __<_ _>__ _|__ _<__ _|__ ___< 08/25 _<__ _>__ _|__ _<__ _|__ ___< 08/26 __|_ _>__ _|__ _<__ _|__ __<_ 08/29 Timing Signals: I don't use or recommend timing signals, but they're fun to watch. If I did though, well, I might use something like this. (Be warned!! It tends to whipsaw around signal points!) Last Signal: SELL Date: 08/16/05 S&P: 1219 Winner or Loser: Winner By: +25 See my market tracking charts for '03-'04 and my investment strategy study at my website(s): http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/Pers.html http://www.geocities.com/paulgrogers/Pers.html Paul Rogers, paulgrogers@yahoo.com -o) http://www.angelfire.com/or/paulrogers /\\ Rogers' Second Law: Everything you do communicates. _\_V .... Why is Brassiere singluar and Panties plural??? ___ MultiMail/MS-DOS v0.35 --- * Origin: The Bare Bones BBS (1:105/360) .