Subj : Market Action To : All From : Paul Rogers Date : Thu Jun 16 2005 07:01 pm Content-type: text/plain Prices were above the line modestly all day. Some more unexciting data was released. And that's the way the market closed. Prices up only about 30% of what it would have taken to be significant, and volume sank to -1% below average. Last year it would have been heavy volume. There's really no way to know what it really means, but how can we think about it if we don't compare it to SOMETHING? Wait a minute... OK, the average volume for the past year and a half, since January 2004, has been 1527Ms, and today's is 1776Ms. Was it really a high volume day? Is January 2004 relevant now? I think the 2200Ms days a couple months ago are more relevant. But they're getting less relevant, and the trend of my moving average is coming down. Either way, we still can't predict the future. I've got a Resistance Line pencilled on my charts at 1214, last year's highs during the Christmas break. We're sneaking up on it. 1211 today. Likewise, there's no way to tell for sure if it's going to affect the Street. It's only relevant as a "technical analysis" issue, really a psychological "self-fulfilling prophecy". The thing is, these sorts of things have been found to work time after time. I'm sure there are lots of Street stock analysts perfectly aware of it, the question is really one of confidence. If they were confident of the market they could just blow right through it. OK, let's say they aren't that confident. There's no evidence of a Bull on my shoes! They can still push prices through by restricting the supply of stock available for those who have to, or really, really, want to buy stocks. It's the old law of Supply and Demand--not enough supply drives prices higher, whether on Wall Street or the corner gas station. If prices move above it with enthusiasm, i.e. on heavy volume, it generally means something entirely different than if it happens in apathy, i.e. normal or lower volume. Well, we'll see. In early March prices were pushed up to 1225 on decreasing volume. That's NOT Bullish. It wasn't until a couple weeks later that volume rose, and drove prices back to 1165. Price Vola- Momen- Volume Oscil- Summ. Change tility tum lator Index -__+ -__+ -__+ -__+ -__+ -__+ _|__ _<__ __|_ _<__ __<_ ___> 06/10 __|_ _<__ __|_ _<__ __|_ ___> 06/13 __|_ <___ __|_ _<__ __|_ ___> 06/14 __|_ <___ __|_ __<_ __|_ ___> 06/15 __>_ <___ __|_ _<__ __>_ ___> 06/16 Timing Signals: I don't use or recommend timing signals, but they're fun to watch. If I did though, well, I might use something like this. (Be warned!! It tends to whipsaw around signal points!) Last Signal: BUY Date: 05/17/05 S&P: 1173 Winner or Loser: tbd By: tbd See my market tracking charts for '03-'04 and my investment strategy study at my website(s): http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/Pers.html http://www.geocities.com/paulgrogers/Pers.html Paul Rogers, paulgrogers@yahoo.com -o) http://www.angelfire.com/or/paulrogers /\\ Rogers' Second Law: Everything you do communicates. _\_V .... Sure, when...OINK FLAP OINK FLAP...Well I'll be damned! ___ MultiMail/MS-DOS v0.35 --- * Origin: The Bare Bones BBS (1:105/360) .