Subj : Market Action To : All From : Paul Rogers Date : Wed May 11 2005 07:02 pm Content-type: text/plain In an effort to assuage the oil-pit's free-running angst more typical of talk-radio, the Int'l Energy Agency released a statement that not only were supplies now sufficient, but best projections for the coming winter showed supplies would also be sufficient albeit with little to spare. The Street wasn't buying it. Market prices were down until after the 2PM close of oil trading, down over a buck, after which they recovered some. That was enough for my formula to reverse itself and pop a Buy signal. I'm not buying that! My simple formula is only based on price action, and is an exercise to show that these sorts of signals are sometimes modestly useful, but ultimately can't do what we want them to--predict the future direction of the market. Volume sank, to close -11% below average. So there was little enthusiasm in the market. The chart shows "top below tops" (1225, 1191, 1179) and "bottoms below bottoms" (1165, 1138), which is Bearish. I went to the market today and bought some frozen peas and some wine. But I wasn't speculating on the future price of the commodities, I brought them home with me. Maybe we should change futures contracts so they're only sold once--the buyer is forced to take delivery. That might run these speculators out of that market and leave it to the businesses who are legitimate suppliers and users of the commodities. Spare me the talk-radio dogma about free markets. The theory is that when prices get irrational others will have incentive to enter the market and rationalize things. That simplistic theory only works when the real commodity is widely available to many traders. Oil isn't. No, I don't want to hear the talk-radio excuses why those crazy Californian NIMBY's and the government are impeding the working of a real free market. Why are there no refineries at all in Oregon? The good citizens of Hermiston are equally concerned what goes on in their back yard. When talk-radio gets outrageous it gets better ratings, meaning more profits for the half-dozen mega-companies that control broadcasting. Not only is exploration hugely expensive, hugely time-consuming, and hugely risky, refineries are "one off", designed and built in place, hugely expensive, hugely time-consuming, and not without their own risks. Oil is not a free market, never has been, and can't be. Oil sources are limited, consumption is "inelastic". Where is the incentive for the integrated oil companies to increase production when they have a product that the consumer MUST buy, no matter what they charge? It's prime for market abuse. I'm thinking of adding an energy fund to my retirement choices to get on the right side of the trend. Price Vola- Momen- Volume Oscil- Summ. Change tility tum lator Index -__+ -__+ -__+ -__+ -__+ -__+ ___> __<_ __|_ __>_ ___> __>_ 05/04 _>__ __<_ __|_ _>__ ___> __>_ 05/05 __>_ _<__ __|_ _|__ ___> __>_ 05/09 _|__ _<__ _|__ _|__ __|_ __>_ 05/10 __|_ _<__ __|_ _<__ __|_ __>_ 05/11 Timing Signals: I don't use or recommend timing signals, but they're fun to watch. If I did though, well, I might use something like this. (Be warned!! It tends to whipsaw around signal points!) Last Signal: BUY Date: 05/11/05 S&P: 1171 Winner or Loser: tbd By: tbd See my market tracking charts for '03-'04 and my investment strategy study at my website(s): http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/Pers.html http://www.geocities.com/paulgrogers/Pers.html Paul Rogers, paulgrogers@yahoo.com -o) http://www.angelfire.com/or/paulrogers /\\ Rogers' Second Law: Everything you do communicates. _\_V .... Day-o...Day-ay-ay-o, Daylight come and me want go home. ___ MultiMail/MS-DOS v0.35 --- * Origin: The Bare Bones BBS (1:105/360) .