Subj : RE: Shazrad]corrections To : All From : royall@hal-pc.org Date : Mon Jul 31 2000 03:17 pm From: "Scott Royall" Subject: RE: Shazrad]corrections Ahem. I'm trying to be nice about the matter, but granting the echo read-only access seems rather ugly. It implies those who cannot, or simply decline to, subscribe to your list are of a lesser class. That's not fair, and there's truly not a valid technical reason for it *if* you have adequate control over your site. It has always been the goal of the echo to be inclusive, not exclusive. Moderator -----Original Message----- From: scott@conchbbs.com [mailto:scott@conchbbs.com] On Behalf Of yl112@cornell.edu Sent: Monday, July 31, 2000 8:14 AM To: Multiple recipients of AD&D MAILING LIST Subject: Shazrad]corrections Sorry--Yune has some clarifications to make. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 15:59:32 +0900 From: Yune Kyung Lee To: Yoon Ha Lee Cc: requiescat@postmark.net Subject: Shazrad bits & pieces Posting to the echo is UNacceptable. There will be other players out there who will NOT be on the echo, and I'm not going to force them to subscribe. All moves MUST be sent by email to the eGroups mailing list. [YHL: I'd forgotten about that. Somehow I was thinking the "lurker" list would be two-way. Sorry--still not completely accustomed to mailing lists.] Also, the fade.to URL is really really unreliable, which is why I switched to http://www.bigfoot.com/~shazrad/ for a forwarding URL. But advertising http://www.pbem-portal.com/fantasy/shazrad/ is just fine. Um...yeah. It's up there now. Just to correct those few things. =) k -- |Fidonet: yl112@cornell.edu |Internet: scott@conchbbs.com | | Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own. -- |Fidonet: royall@hal-pc.org |Internet: scott@conchbbs.com | | Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own. --- # Origin: (1:106/357.99) * Origin: ConchGate (1:106/357.0) .