Subj : Re: New Game...? To : All From : yl112@cornell.edu Date : Sat Jul 08 2000 08:49 am From: yl112@cornell.edu Subject: Re: New Game...? On Sat, 8 Jul 2000, Andrew S. Toth wrote: > Once again, I state that I respect your opinions. However, while you may feel that your statements are designed to make me think and revamp my quest because of past experiences which you have had, and thus to hopefully yield a better quest, I view them a little differently. I don't look at them maliciously, but I do find a small problem. They reduce that element of trust. Just a thought, Andrew--I think perhaps you should trust your players to look at your record and their own feelings on the matter, and come to their own conclusions. Harold feels this way; I somewhat agree with him (but probably don't have the time--when classes start up--to play anyway, so it doesn't matter for me); and other people will reach their own conclusions. :-) Remember, you had a lot of players who enjoyed Sigils. They know what you can do. Heck, the "players wake up with amnesia" (plus whatever new fillips) gambit is pretty old, too. But old ideas will always be new for new players, is the beauty of it--and I strongly suspect there *are* players who will see what this new campaign is about. > You're cutting my player-pool to ribbons here, Harold. I realize that your experience with such scenarios has either been sour, over-played, or a little of both. Perhaps with others, too. But, at the same time, Sigils of Erasure is, I feel, a prime example of how things did not flow according to the norm. I write in my spare time, Harold. I know enough from what I write, and what I read, just how boringly repetitive some situations can be if those responsible for the creation of those situations don't add a number of interesting twists. Actually, I'd wait until you've applied to run the campaign *and* have started receiving player applications (or not) before coming to that conclusion. YHL, contemplating the advantages of running a web-based game -- |Fidonet: yl112@cornell.edu |Internet: scott@conchbbs.com | | Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own. --- # Origin: (1:106/357.99) * Origin: ConchGate (1:106/357.0) .