Subj : Re: New Game...?
To   : All
From : Andrew_S._Toth@wlm.toronto.on.ca
Date : Wed Jul 05 2000 09:30 pm

From: Andrew_S._Toth@wlm.toronto.on.ca (Andrew S. Toth)
Subject: Re: New Game...?
Organization: W. L. Mackenzie C. I.



Scott Royall writes:

> I must ask if there is a reasonable expectation that you can sustain this=


> effort at least 90 days.


I understand that question, given last time.


With the move out of the way, things are looking up for me (which is a rari=
ty in itself, but nevermind that for now). Everything seems to be going wel=
l.


I can't guarantee that it will last 90 days; no GM can. If the players deci=
de that it sucks, then what can I do to stop them from leaving? Not much.

I can say to you that for *my* end of the campaign, I can hold it for 90 da=
ys easily, barring unforseen disease and/or death.


It's that 91st day I don't know about, though...<<G> (just thought I'd toss=
 some humour in here...)


So, I hope that answer satisfies you. You've got to remember that keeping a=
 campaign running *is* a joint effort between players and GM.


Andrew





--
|Fidonet:  Andrew_S._Toth@wlm.toronto.on.ca
|Internet: scott@conchbbs.com
|
| Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own.


---
 # Origin:  (1:106/357.99)
 * Origin: ConchGate (1:106/357.0)

.