Subj : Knowledge of Good & Evil To : RICHARD M. MEIC From : LEE LOFASO Date : Mon Jul 23 2001 01:41 pm Hello Richard, >LL>What makes you so sure it was a *bad* tangent? RMM>Because it had absolutely nothing to do with the topic and everything to RMM>do with a person's percieved insult. The topic itslef never got off the RMM>ground. I once insulted a psychiatrist to the point he tried writing with an eraser. That's when I knew I had really gotten inside the guy's head. :) >LL>Before I bring in Pavlov's dog, let me say that you have brought up > >an excellent point. Can you extrapolate more on that thought? RMM>Possibly. Please do. >LL>Could > >it be that before the fall, Adam and Eve had no concept (knowledge) > >of good and evil prior to eating of the forbidden fruit? If so, > >that would seem to indicate that the knowledge of good and evil was > >external before they ate the golden fruit, and internal after they > >ate the fruit. RMM>I am unable to answer this question under the grounds that it has RMM>a heavy biblical influence. Then use reasoning from other knowledge. Hobbes, Rousseau, Carneades, Nietzche, Evolutionists of all kinds, as well as Socialists seem to disagree with your point of view. Even Occam and Descartes beg different views. The theory all of these philosophers hold is that of 'Moral Positivism' - albeit each in a different light. RMM>I am sorry, but because of past experience I refuse RMM>to discuss anything under those conditions. There is no 'heavy biblical influence' as you seem to imply. It's a biblical story used to demonstrate a philosophical point. The question addressed is "What is the origin of evil?", or more precisely, "What is the origin of the distinction between good and evil?". Your stated position is that it is internal rather than external. If so, when did this 'internal' manifestation of evil begin? What is it's origin? It should be kept in mind this question is subjugant to the universal principle "Do good and avoid evil." Kind of hard to base a philosophy on "Do evil and avoid good" - unless one is a Satanist. :) note: In order to gain knowledge, there are three main ways of doing so. One way is direct observation, in which an individual observes an actual event. Another way is by reports from other people. And still one other way is by reasoning from other knowledge. By using one or more of these three ways, an individual can generally come up with a valid and sound conclusion. Hope that helps. --Lee * SLMR 2.1a * He says it kills all the rats and--oh dear! --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5 * Origin: Try Our Web Based QWK: DOCSPLACE.ORG (1:18/140) .