Subj : Re: Extent of the Torah To : JOHN WILSON From : TODD HENSON Date : Sun Nov 05 2000 07:24 pm > SGID: 1:153/7715.0 3a050d6e > -=> TODD HENSON wrote to JOHN WILSON <=- > > > > > TH> So, you were referring to the universe itself being alive. OK. > TH> But, wan't it you who disagreed > TH> when I said that you said that the continuum itself was alive? > > Nope. What do you mean exactly, by "continuum?" Space-time? You don't know what the space-time continuum is? Is there some part of the universe OTHER than space-time that you believe is intelligent? > TH> That would make this recent > TH> answer contradictory to your previous one, so I'm a bit confused > TH> now. > > > ----------- > > > TH> Also, if you were referring to the univsere itself being alive, > TH> then another bit of confusion arises. I > TH> asked why you thought the universe was alive. If you said > TH> because of the presence of > TH> intelligence in the universe, then what you basically said was "I > TH> believe the universe is alive > TH> because I believe it is alive". > > No. I enter no "because" in my opinion. > > So I don't know quite what to > TH> make of that. > > You are confused by thinking I said things I didn't, > and then drawing conclusions contradicting things I *did* say. You are confusing because your statements are contradictory. > > ============================ > > > > TH> That's like saying a baby learned how to build a computer when it > > TH> did. > > > > A baby with an infinite about of time to play with her infinite > > rescouces... > > > > Did! The Baby was mankind of course, and we as a race are still very > > young... > > > TH> I thought the universe was the baby, learning as it goes along. > > Exactly. Baby universe. Baby mankind. We're ALL learnin' :-) Well, that doesn't really do much to answer the questions that have arisen around this topic. --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr4 * Origin: BBS Networks @ www.bbsnets.com 808-839-5016 (1:10/345) .