Subj : Rawley's Incessant Whine To : ROY WITT From : BOBBY QUEEN Date : Sat Nov 04 2000 09:55 pm Hello Roy! In a message to Bobby Queen <11/04/2000> Roy Witt wrote: RW> Hello BOBBY. RW> 03 Nov 00 21:36, you wrote to STEVE KEMP: BQ>> Hello Steve! BQ>> In a message to Ralph Zetter <11/03/2000> Steve Kemp wrote: RZ>>>>> BTW). Then you resort to name-calling, labelling me a "dumbass". RZ>>>>> You're no better than Todd or Constance. RZ>>>> I was responding to the level of spite that you were producing. SK>>> Yep, while responding with a high level of spite. RZ>>>> if you don't like it, change your ways. SK>>> Meaning that if he doesn't appreciate your pomposity and hypocrisy SK>>> HE should change his ways? SK>>> Figures that you would believe that you have the freedom of SK>>> expression but others don't. SK>>> Pig. RZ>>>> But if you don't wanna change your attitude little boy, and you RZ>>>> choose to call people RZ>>>> hateful when that what YOU are, then don't be surprised if people RZ>>>> think evil of you because of it. SK>>> I've witnessed far more hateful garbage coming from YOU toward SK>>> Joseph than vice versa. RZ>>>> RZ>> I've read some of your posts, both here and in the Matzdobre RZ>>>> RZ>> echo, and you are quite fond of being vile and dirty. RZ>>>>> Not in this echo, I haven't been. Todd started the name-calling RZ>>>> when he called RZ>>>> No, you haven't, you've just been baby-ish. SK>>> And you have been adult? Hypocrisy is the adult tack? RZ>>>>> me an INSANE PERVERT and then Constance dragged in Matzdobre and RZ>>>> began her RZ>>>> I'm inclined to agree with him. SK>>> Again you directly insult because you find someone else SK>>> insulting...on ANOTHER ECHO at that. SK>>> You're out to lunch, kid. RZ>>>>> onslaught of name-calling as well. Why don't you be honest with RZ>>>>> yourself? This isn't the Matzdobre echo and I had been rational RZ>>>>> here all along until Constance started her character attacks RZ>>>>> against me merely because I post in Matzdobre. It's people like RZ>>>>> you that make me sick. RZ>>>> Yeah, justify yourself. Go ahead. SK>>> He stated the truth. SK>>> Yeah, pervert that. Go ahead. RZ>>>>> You didn't even understand the context. Had you read the earlier RZ>>>>> exchange it might have been clearer to you. I made no commentary RZ>>>> on what was being taught RZ>>>>> by anyone. I commented on the school board for standing up to RZ>>>>> whatever group it was. My message was NOT perverted and you know RZ>>>>> it. RZ>>>> I understood the context, I reviewed the material, I saw the RZ>>>> exchange, and you were pegged rightly so. SK>>> Bull. You're just out to validate your want of political correctness SK>>> mixed with unilateral liberties for you and your Jesus-fuckers.. RZ>>>>> That's what I HAD been doing. THEY launched this character attack RZ>>>>> crusade, Ralph. I certainly didn't. RZ>>>> Oh, it's THEIR FAULT!! Wahhhhhhh. Sure, you never were abrasive or RZ>>>> aggressive before then, RZ>>>> were you? SK>>> What does that matter? YOU are abrasive and aggressive. Thus, you SK>>> can't jump another for same without being rightfully called a SK>>> hypocrite. RZ>>>> Sure, they had no reason to think ill of you, did they? SK>>> So if they think ill of someone that gives them licence? Then why SK>>> doesn't Joseph likewise have such licence in the Matzdobre echo? SK>>> Face it, you're simply a hypocritical religious fascism supporter. RZ>>>> Well young fellow, I've been RZ>>>> catching up on some of the past stuff in the echo, and I see you as RZ>>>> being too eager to "win", RZ>>>> like a child. SK>>> Being interested in debate and working hard at doing it properly SK>>> against flip-flopping idiots is hardly an indication of a childish SK>>> ego problem. RZ>>>> You're willing to attack and exaggerate things just to RZ>>>> artificially make someone else look bad. SK>>> Bull. SK>>> And I see you as the attack dog here, son. SK>>> Like so many religionists you too must project as well as directly SK>>> lie. And, of course, your hypocrisy is astounding. SK>>> I'm sure your God is very proud of you. RZ>>>>> So, everyone who posts there are morons then? Just look at how RZ>>>>> you label rational, intelligent people like that. Why do you call RZ>>>>> people morons when they simply aren't? RZ>>>> Rational intelligent people don't continually act like that. Grow RZ>>>> up. I figured you to be about 17 - 20 years old. SK>>> And that kind of response makes me think that you're 12. RZ>>>> RZ>> The only liar here is you, little man. RZ>>>>> You're lying, Ralph. Still name-calling, I see. RZ>>>> What a joke you are. You call me a liar by saying I'm dishonest, RZ>>>> and that's OK. SK>>> Actually, he DIRECTLY stated that you are lying. And you are. RZ>>>> I say you are a RZ>>>> liar and just use fewer words, and I'm bad for that? Hmmmm....maybe RZ>>>> you ARE insane. SK>>> What a rambling little bitch you are. RZ>>>>> Are you going to call me a PERVERT now too? RZ>>>> Ya certainly ain't normal. hehe - back on the farm, we had uses for RZ>>>> folks like you. SK>>> You're a poor excuse for a human, Ralphie boy. SK>>> Ya sickening piece of shit. BQ>> Steve, one more message like this after you've had time to see my BQ>> response and you will have your access cut. And I have never had to BQ>> even threaten that since I got this echo from the former moderator. BQ>> Please make sure you read my message to all I posted a few messages BQ>> back. SK>>> You and Todd and that sickening bitch Rawley purposely turned this SK>>> echo into a FLAME VOIGHT echo and then you all blame Voight. Sure, SK>>> it's been alot more interesting than the usual rambling philosophy SK>>> pap that's usually here but the hypocrisy of you and your ilk is SK>>> still pretty disgusting. I'll leave you and your hypocritical SK>>> bitches to it then. I simply felt compelled to address the point. SK>>> That point being that you are yours have YET AGAIN demonstrated how SK>>> ethically and morally bankrupt you really are while at the same time SK>>> pretending to be oh so pious. SK>>> Fuck you and fuck your death cult. BQ>> This language doesn't belong in here AT ALL. Take it back to FLAME BQ>> or wherever you came from. You have been posting in this echo a BQ>> short time and have already pushed me to the point of having to BQ>> intervene. Remember I had rather sit back and not have to do BQ>> anything. BQ>> Bobby Queen _ /| Sysop of The Wizard's Castle BBS! BQ>> \'*.OB wizards@shelby.net 1:379/5 704-434-8904 24hrs BQ>> =(___)= OFFICIAL FOTI Site Manager BQ>> U http://foti.webjump.com BQ>> ... *****-----========== OFFICIAL Moderator ==========-----***** BQ>> -+- Platinum Xpress/386/Wildcat! v1.4a BQ>> + Origin: The Wizard's Castle BBS : 704-434-8904 (1:379/5) RW> As Captain of the Moderator Compliance Council (MCC), it is my job RW> to inform you that you're in violation of MCC rule number 4, subpart a. RW> MCC rules of conduct. RW> 4a. RW> Keep your quoting to the minimum necessary to establish the RW> context of your reply. Certainly, don't quote more than you RW> originate. RW> Do not include the other persons - hello, goodbye, "In a RW> message to" lines, offline mail reader signatures, taglines, RW> mail tosser PID lines or origin lines in your quote unless RW> you are specifically replying to them. RW> Roy Witt, Captain RW> Moderator Compliance Council... RW> PS, Please clean up your english grammar. The MCC suggests English 101 RW> classes at your local 'adult education' facility, for moderators in RW> need. Roy take any beef about my moderating style to NetMail. Thanks. Bobby Queen _ /| Sysop of The Wizard's Castle BBS! \'*.O` wizards@shelby.net 1:379/5 704-434-8904 24hrs =(___)= OFFICIAL FOTI Site Manager U http://foti.webjump.com .... *****-----========== OFFICIAL Moderator ==========-----***** --- Platinum Xpress/386/Wildcat! v1.4a * Origin: The Wizard's Castle BBS : 704-434-8904 (1:379/5) .