Subj : Rawley's Incessant Whine To : BOBBY QUEEN From : Roy Witt Date : Sat Nov 04 2000 05:06 am Hello BOBBY. 03 Nov 00 21:36, you wrote to STEVE KEMP: BQ> Hello Steve! BQ> In a message to Ralph Zetter <11/03/2000> Steve Kemp wrote: RZ>>>> BTW). Then you resort to name-calling, labelling me a "dumbass". RZ>>>> You're no better than Todd or Constance. RZ>>> I was responding to the level of spite that you were producing. SK>> Yep, while responding with a high level of spite. RZ>>> if you don't like it, change your ways. SK>> Meaning that if he doesn't appreciate your pomposity and hypocrisy SK>> HE should change his ways? SK>> Figures that you would believe that you have the freedom of SK>> expression but others don't. SK>> Pig. RZ>>> But if you don't wanna change your attitude little boy, and you RZ>>> choose to call people RZ>>> hateful when that what YOU are, then don't be surprised if people RZ>>> think evil of you because of it. SK>> I've witnessed far more hateful garbage coming from YOU toward SK>> Joseph than vice versa. RZ>>> RZ>> I've read some of your posts, both here and in the Matzdobre RZ>>> RZ>> echo, and you are quite fond of being vile and dirty. RZ>>>> Not in this echo, I haven't been. Todd started the name-calling RZ>>> when he called RZ>>> No, you haven't, you've just been baby-ish. SK>> And you have been adult? Hypocrisy is the adult tack? RZ>>>> me an INSANE PERVERT and then Constance dragged in Matzdobre and RZ>>> began her RZ>>> I'm inclined to agree with him. SK>> Again you directly insult because you find someone else SK>> insulting...on ANOTHER ECHO at that. SK>> You're out to lunch, kid. RZ>>>> onslaught of name-calling as well. Why don't you be honest with RZ>>>> yourself? This isn't the Matzdobre echo and I had been rational RZ>>>> here all along until Constance started her character attacks RZ>>>> against me merely because I post in Matzdobre. It's people like RZ>>>> you that make me sick. RZ>>> Yeah, justify yourself. Go ahead. SK>> He stated the truth. SK>> Yeah, pervert that. Go ahead. RZ>>>> You didn't even understand the context. Had you read the earlier RZ>>>> exchange it might have been clearer to you. I made no commentary RZ>>> on what was being taught RZ>>>> by anyone. I commented on the school board for standing up to RZ>>>> whatever group it was. My message was NOT perverted and you know RZ>>>> it. RZ>>> I understood the context, I reviewed the material, I saw the RZ>>> exchange, and you were pegged rightly so. SK>> Bull. You're just out to validate your want of political correctness SK>> mixed with unilateral liberties for you and your Jesus-fuckers.. RZ>>>> That's what I HAD been doing. THEY launched this character attack RZ>>>> crusade, Ralph. I certainly didn't. RZ>>> Oh, it's THEIR FAULT!! Wahhhhhhh. Sure, you never were abrasive or RZ>>> aggressive before then, RZ>>> were you? SK>> What does that matter? YOU are abrasive and aggressive. Thus, you SK>> can't jump another for same without being rightfully called a SK>> hypocrite. RZ>>> Sure, they had no reason to think ill of you, did they? SK>> So if they think ill of someone that gives them licence? Then why SK>> doesn't Joseph likewise have such licence in the Matzdobre echo? SK>> Face it, you're simply a hypocritical religious fascism supporter. RZ>>> Well young fellow, I've been RZ>>> catching up on some of the past stuff in the echo, and I see you as RZ>>> being too eager to "win", RZ>>> like a child. SK>> Being interested in debate and working hard at doing it properly SK>> against flip-flopping idiots is hardly an indication of a childish SK>> ego problem. RZ>>> You're willing to attack and exaggerate things just to RZ>>> artificially make someone else look bad. SK>> Bull. SK>> And I see you as the attack dog here, son. SK>> Like so many religionists you too must project as well as directly SK>> lie. And, of course, your hypocrisy is astounding. SK>> I'm sure your God is very proud of you. RZ>>>> So, everyone who posts there are morons then? Just look at how RZ>>>> you label rational, intelligent people like that. Why do you call RZ>>>> people morons when they simply aren't? RZ>>> Rational intelligent people don't continually act like that. Grow RZ>>> up. I figured you to be about 17 - 20 years old. SK>> And that kind of response makes me think that you're 12. RZ>>> RZ>> The only liar here is you, little man. RZ>>>> You're lying, Ralph. Still name-calling, I see. RZ>>> What a joke you are. You call me a liar by saying I'm dishonest, RZ>>> and that's OK. SK>> Actually, he DIRECTLY stated that you are lying. And you are. RZ>>> I say you are a RZ>>> liar and just use fewer words, and I'm bad for that? Hmmmm....maybe RZ>>> you ARE insane. SK>> What a rambling little bitch you are. RZ>>>> Are you going to call me a PERVERT now too? RZ>>> Ya certainly ain't normal. hehe - back on the farm, we had uses for RZ>>> folks like you. SK>> You're a poor excuse for a human, Ralphie boy. SK>> Ya sickening piece of shit. BQ> Steve, one more message like this after you've had time to see my BQ> response and you will have your access cut. And I have never had to BQ> even threaten that since I got this echo from the former moderator. BQ> Please make sure you read my message to all I posted a few messages BQ> back. SK>> You and Todd and that sickening bitch Rawley purposely turned this SK>> echo into a FLAME VOIGHT echo and then you all blame Voight. Sure, SK>> it's been alot more interesting than the usual rambling philosophy SK>> pap that's usually here but the hypocrisy of you and your ilk is SK>> still pretty disgusting. I'll leave you and your hypocritical SK>> bitches to it then. I simply felt compelled to address the point. SK>> That point being that you are yours have YET AGAIN demonstrated how SK>> ethically and morally bankrupt you really are while at the same time SK>> pretending to be oh so pious. SK>> Fuck you and fuck your death cult. BQ> This language doesn't belong in here AT ALL. Take it back to FLAME BQ> or wherever you came from. You have been posting in this echo a BQ> short time and have already pushed me to the point of having to BQ> intervene. Remember I had rather sit back and not have to do BQ> anything. BQ> Bobby Queen _ /| Sysop of The Wizard's Castle BBS! BQ> \'*.O` wizards@shelby.net 1:379/5 704-434-8904 24hrs BQ> =(___)= OFFICIAL FOTI Site Manager BQ> U http://foti.webjump.com BQ> ... *****-----========== OFFICIAL Moderator ==========-----***** BQ> -+- Platinum Xpress/386/Wildcat! v1.4a BQ> + Origin: The Wizard's Castle BBS : 704-434-8904 (1:379/5) As Captain of the Moderator Compliance Council (MCC), it is my job to inform you that you're in violation of MCC rule number 4, subpart a. MCC rules of conduct. 4a. Keep your quoting to the minimum necessary to establish the context of your reply. Certainly, don't quote more than you originate. Do not include the other persons - hello, goodbye, "In a message to" lines, offline mail reader signatures, taglines, mail tosser PID lines or origin lines in your quote unless you are specifically replying to them. Roy Witt, Captain Moderator Compliance Council... PS, Please clean up your english grammar. The MCC suggests English 101 classes at your local 'adult education' facility, for moderators in need. .... Where there's a will, there's a lawsuit. --- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000 * Origin: Califia's Devil Star * (1:10/22) .