Subj : Echo in shambles, sorry
To   : JOHN WILSON
From : TODD HENSON
Date : Sat Nov 04 2000 01:29 am

>  TH> would not however apologize
>  TH> for characterizing that response as being a perverted response,
>  TH> wording it as "Joe, that was a
>  TH> perverted response, which implies clear agreement with the
>  TH> teaching of perversion as a matter
>  TH> of bucking the JudeoChristian value system", because that was the
>  TH> clear meaning of your
>  TH> words.
> 
>  Well, Todd it was certainly not clear to me. I read it entirely
>  differently. Nowhere in my reading of his responce was there so
>  much of a hint of `agreement with the teaching of perversion'
>  ---a moments reflection and clearly will there be seen the need
>  to understand what the other means by perversion.
> 
>  Would you say for example, that tantric sex is perverted?
> 
>  I'd be interested in your rersponse.


I think the issue of perverted sex is overdone in PHIL recently. I'll just
say that there certainly 
ARE aspects of tantra which might fall into that category, and leave it at
that.


>  TH> But as I said, I can't be held responsible for how people choose
>  TH> to continue to exaggerate...
>  TH> ... if the
>  TH> resident hate-spewers...
> 
>   :-)
> 
>   I know of no "hate spewers" in here. The closest one comes to that here
>   are "outrageous opinions". These are, of course those which differ from
>   mine :-)


If you do not see what I am referring to, the I must call your objectivity
into question.
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr4
 * Origin: BBS Networks @ www.bbsnets.com 808-839-5016 (1:10/345)

.