Subj : Lurk Mode
To   : Constance Rawley
From : Joseph Voigt
Date : Fri Nov 03 2000 02:44 pm

Friday November 03 2000 14:39, CONSTANCE RAWLEY wrote to JOSEPH VOIGT:

 JW>>> C'mon, you didn't trapse over to this echo to throw shots
 JW>>> pertaining to another echo...

 CR>> No, I don't think I did.

 JV>> You sure DID.  Your very first message after you came out of
 JV>> lurk mode dragged in Matzdobre in your hateful attempt to
 JV>> attack my character.

 CR>  You're wrong. The FACTS prove it.

Not true at all, Constance.  You are incorrect.  See below.

 CR> My first post to this echo was on September 15th. It was a response
 CR> to someone's claims that the world is overpopulated.

 CR>  My next post to this echo was a month later on October 16th.
 CR>  It was to ALL concerning a group's plans to ascend the Temple Mount.

Two sprinkled posts in 31 days remains... now watch this... LURK MODE.

 CR>  My third post was three days later. It was a reply to John Wilson
 CR>  regarding his reference to "the number of the beast."

Three sprinkled posts in 34 days remains... now watch again... LURK MODE.

 CR>  My post to you was 33 days after I first posted to this forum.

Not true.  Your fourth message was posted on 24 Oct, 39 days (not 33) after 
your first post... and 5 days after your previous... when you finally slipped 
out of... now watch carefully, Constance... LURK MODE... and dragged along the 
Matzdobre echo with you when you INITIATED your character attacks, thus 
starting your little flame war, remaining since.

Now, go back up to the top there and READ what I actually said.  Here, I'll do 
it for you.  "Your very first message after you came out of lurk mode dragged 
in Matzdobre..."

Now, you were saying?

 CR>  Anyone can verify this by browsing through the messages on the
 CR>  Hafa Adai BBS.

Indeed they can.  Your very first post after coming out of lurk mode initiated 
your whole character attack escapade, dragging along Matzdobre.

 CR>  I don't know how much longer you're going to be allowed to disrupt
 CR>  this echo.

As you initiated the disruption of the echo when you started this little 
character attack escapade of yours, perhaps you should address that to 
yourself.  Until your little flame escapade, things were running just fine 
without disruption.  Now, ask yourself why that is.

 CR> I'm hoping that the moderator, if there IS a moderator,
 CR>  will eventually wake up and do something about the stench you've
 CR>  introduced to this echo.

I didn't introduce any stench here, Constance.  Aren't you really talking about 
yourself here, what with the way you started this little flame war of yours and 
all?

 CR> As for the charge that I attacked your "character," I'll just say
 CR> this, you are your own worst enemy!

So, the charge is true then, is it?  I already knew that.

 CR>  Your participation in the Matzdobre echo demonstrates that you've
 CR>  no regard for your reputation in the community,

Again, this isn't the Matzdobre echo.  YOU introduced that echo here, remember? 
 My reputation is just fine, as are most every other person's reputations who 
participate in any flame echoes.  Most everyone (except for at least Hunter 
himself) who participates in Matzdobre is very reputable (myself included).  
Too bad you cannot accept it.

 CR> unless your intent is to be notorious,

It isn't from my or most viewpoints... except from the POV of Hunter, which, of 
course, IS my intent.

 CR> in which case, you'll have to compete with the other imbeciles in
 CR> the Matzdobre echo.

So, all the other participants there are imbeciles then?  Please remember who 
you all include with that very broad brush stroke of yours.

 CR>  "Bad is a relative concept" - Joseph Voigt, pervert, liar, hatemonger

Still carrying on with your little flames, huh?  How sweet.

.... Mark 16:15-18.  I'll pour.
--- FastEcho 1.46 (reg)
 * Origin: The Danse - Where Norse Gods Ponder Their Navels (1:387/638)

.