Subj : Echo in shambles, sorry
To   : Todd Henson
From : John Wilson
Date : Fri Nov 03 2000 01:10 pm

-=> TODD HENSON wrote to ALL <=-

 TH> ...I
 TH> would not however apologize
 TH> for characterizing that response as being a perverted response,
 TH> wording it as "Joe, that was a
 TH> perverted response, which implies clear agreement with the
 TH> teaching of perversion as a matter
 TH> of bucking the JudeoChristian value system", because that was the
 TH> clear meaning of your
 TH> words.

 Well, Todd it was certainly not clear to me. I read it entirely
 differently. Nowhere in my reading of his responce was there so
 much of a hint of `agreement with the teaching of perversion'
 ---a moments reflection and clearly will there be seen the need
 to understand what the other means by perversion.

 Would you say for example, that tantric sex is perverted?

 I'd be interested in your rersponse.


 TH> But as I said, I can't be held responsible for how people choose
 TH> to continue to exaggerate...
 TH> ... if the
 TH> resident hate-spewers...

  :-)

  I know of no "hate spewers" in here. The closest one comes to that here
  are "outrageous opinions". These are, of course those which differ from
  mine :-)


.... Klein bottle for rent. Inquire within.

--- Maximus 3.01
 * Origin: The BandMaster, Vancouver, B.C., Canada (1:153/7715)

.