Subj : Rawley's Incessant Whine To : JOSEPH VOIGT From : RALPH ZETTER Date : Thu Nov 02 2000 11:13 pm > Thursday November 02 2000 07:14, RALPH ZETTER wrote to JOSEPH VOIGT: > > >> RZ> I've only been peeking in just a bit here, but it does seem > >> RZ> that Todd likes to grab the bull by the horns, doesn't he? I'd > >> RZ> have to agree though with your opinion of Mr. Voigt, > >> > >> You are a hateful little person, aren't you? By agreeing with > >> Constance's opinion of me as being a pervert, you have also > >> effectively LABELLED me as > > RZ> Huh? Man, what a dumbass you are. > > Just look at yourself, Ralph. I ask you a simple question where a "yes" or > "no" should suffice and you fly off the handle (you didn't answer the question, > BTW). Then you resort to name-calling, labelling me a "dumbass". You're no > better than Todd or Constance. I was responding to the level of spite that you were producing. if you don't like it, change your ways. But if you don't wanna change your attitude little boy, and you choose to call people hateful when that what YOU are, then don't be surprised if people think evil of you because of it. > > RZ> I don't even know you and already I don't like you. > > Do you dislike everyone you don't know? > > RZ> I've read some of your posts, both here and in the Matzdobre echo, > RZ> and you are quite fond of being vile and dirty. > > Not in this echo, I haven't been. Todd started the name-calling when he called No, you haven't, you've just been baby-ish. > me an INSANE PERVERT and then Constance dragged in Matzdobre and began her I'm inclined to agree with him. > onslaught of name-calling as well. Why don't you be honest with yourself? > This isn't the Matzdobre echo and I had been rational here all along until > Constance started her character attacks against me merely because I post in > Matzdobre. It's people like you that make me sick. Yeah, justify yourself. Go ahead. > > RZ> I read your reply to Todd's stuff about schools teaching kids > RZ> fisting, and your only reply was that it was nice to see someone > RZ> rebel against whatever, not even mentioned that to teach kids that > RZ> stuff in school is perverted. So yeah, your message looked perverted. > > You didn't even understand the context. Had you read the earlier exchange it > might have been clearer to you. I made no commentary on what was being taught > by anyone. I commented on the school board for standing up to whatever group > it was. My message was NOT perverted and you know it. I understood the context, I reviewed the material, I saw the exchange, and you were pegged rightly so. > > RZ> I've gone back through the messages here and have read many of the > RZ> posts to get a feel for everyone here. At every moment you act like a > RZ> spoiled brat who is trying to stretch stuff and win, it's like you > RZ> have a small penis and are trying to make up for it or something. > > Just look at yourself, Ralph. Now you are comparing penises? What's the > matter with you? Act like a spoiled brat? I don't stretch anything to win > anything. I use reasoned argument. If you say so. > > RZ> If a person doesn't agree with Todd or whoever, then they can > RZ> disagree and explain why they think he, Constance, or whoever, is > RZ> wrong. > > That's what I HAD been doing. THEY launched this character attack crusade, > Ralph. I certainly didn't. Oh, it's THEIR FAULT!! Wahhhhhhh. Sure, you never were abrasive or aggressive before then, were you? Sure, they had no reason to think ill of you, did they? Well young fellow, I've been catching up on some of the past stuff in the echo, and I see you as being too eager to "win", like a child. You're willing to attack and exaggerate things just to artificially make someone else look bad. > > RZ> But you go to such stupid lengths, showing obvious hostility, you > RZ> make yourself look just plain dumb. > > Just look at yourself. Just plain dumb? This is a philosophy echo and I had > been presenting rational argument all along, with tartness thrown in from time > to time for good measure. That is my style here. Just plain dumb?? Are you > being deliberately ignorant or do you have to work at it? > > RZ> You are someone to be laughed at. HAHAHAHA. > > You are being silly. > > > RZ> As I told him, I took him up on his > RZ> challenge to see his messages over there. I went through pages and > RZ> pages and pages of crap from morons like you, and I only saw a small > RZ> tiny percentage of posts made by Todd here and there. > > So, everyone who posts there are morons then? Just look at how you label > rational, intelligent people like that. Why do you call people morons when > they simply aren't? Rational intelligent people don't continually act like that. Grow up. I figured you to be about 17 - 20 years old. > >> RZ> I suppose Joseph is an atheist. > >> > >> Suppose all you want. But I'm a little more honest than you, else > >> I'd suppose you are Celtic Scientologist. > > RZ> No. > > I say you are. I don't even know what that is. I've heard of Scientologists, but not a Celtic one. > > >> tells me you are deliberately dishonest in calling me something I > >> simply am > > RZ> The only liar here is you, little man. > > You're lying, Ralph. Still name-calling, I see. What a joke you are. You call me a liar by saying I'm dishonest, and that's OK. I say you are a liar and just use fewer words, and I'm bad for that? Hmmmm....maybe you ARE insane. > Are you going to call me a PERVERT now too? Ya certainly ain't normal. hehe - back on the farm, we had uses for folks like you. --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr4 * Origin: BBS Networks @ www.bbsnets.com 808-839-5016 (1:10/345) .