Subj : Re: Extent of the Torah To : Todd Henson From : John Wilson Date : Wed Nov 01 2000 07:30 pm -=> TODD HENSON wrote to JOHN WILSON <=- > > TH> To say that intelligence exists within it (as in, it contains > TH> living creatures) > > No no....no implication of living creatures... TH> There are no living creatures in our universe? No no...that the universe is (becoming) intelligent has only tangental relevance to the fact there there are living creatures... Well, I'm alive, I TH> live in this continuum, so I'm not TH> sure what you're disagreeing with. The presumption of "living creatures" when intelligence is propounded. > TH> is no where NEAR > TH> saying that the actual continuum IS intelligent, which is exactly > TH> what is meant by saying the > TH> universe is conscious. > > It's becoming more conscious. It's consciousness is partially > dependent upon knowledge which it is accumulating. TH> Then how did it create life before it learned how? It learned how when it did. It has a lot of time to experiment: Perhaps mankind is merely one of it's amiable blunders...(And no, I do not believe that :-) TH> And why stop your line of pondering with this universe? If you TH> are comparing it to a baby that is TH> growing and learning, then it must have had some kind of TH> "parent". Other universes, and a possible "Father of God" is a conjecture I consider fruitless. > Th> That's like saying that ocean water is > TH> itself is alive because it contains > TH> living creatures. > > No, it is not. TH> Yes, it is. > Th> Or, that the ocean is intelligent because it > TH> contains intelligent humans who are > TH> always in it at any given time. So, which is it? > > Neither. TH> Then there's no reason to believe that the universe is alive TH> simply because there are living TH> creatures in it. Well, of course not! YOU are the one that brought up living creatures! I never used that awkward fulcrum! ___ MultiMail/MS-DOS v0.32 --- Maximus 3.01 * Origin: The BandMaster, Vancouver, B.C., Canada (1:153/7715) .