Subj : Rush to Judgement? To : Todd Henson From : Joseph Voigt Date : Wed Nov 01 2000 11:30 am Wednesday November 01 2000 11:15, TODD HENSON wrote to RALPH ZETTER: >> Matzdobre is a misspelling of matzobre. It is quite the little >> vulgar hatefest there, so I didn't post there, nor go back. They all >> sound like a bunch of babies who follow you around and yell things >> at you because they themselves are weak. Every last one of them. One >> big pig pen you might say. :-) TH> On that we would agree. Did you miss the fact that he called you a pig, a baby, and being weak? As you wallow around there rather frequently with your posts, he's included YOU also in his opinion. You agree with his opinion, and thus have just told us you are a pig. Thanks for the admission. TH> A "person like Todd"? What am I like? Well, he said you are a pig and you agreed with him. TH> As I said, I am direct. Are you going to call me an INSANE PERVERT again? TH> But there are certain core truths that are not negotiable. But the TH> writings of Paul in the NT keep following me around lately, where he TH> wrote that even though the gentiles did not have the benefit of TH> receiving God's Law in as detailed a manner as the Hebrews did, they TH> still could obey the law of God that was written in their hearts and TH> become a law unto themselves. The soul of man is attracted to the idea TH> of meaning in life that transcends the physical, and all men have an TH> intuitive knowledge of such truths, truths which point to God. Please evidence these "truths" or there is no reason to think they are. TH> So, while I might sau that Buddha was wrong in his ideas of TH> reincarnation, the gods, etc, I can still see the value in his TH> teachings of the "right path", which were motivated by the attraction TH> of his soul toward God, given the amount of truth that he DID know. TH> And I can't summarily declare that he is in hell just because he TH> wasn't a Christian. You're going to send him there, nontheless, right? TH> And there is a difference between a person who is a unbeliever TH> because he denied Jesus, and being an unbeliever because he never TH> even heard of Jesus but was searching for God according to the amount TH> of light that he DID have. Big difference. No there isn't. Not everyone buys into your delusions about gods at all, Todd. There is simply no difference in one who has heard of jesus and one who hasn't if both accept the jesus myth as presented. You are dismissed. Now, are you going to send me to the hell in your mind? Lucky for you, that hell will disappear just as soon as your mind does. You don't get to send me to any part of your delusions. >> > I think Voigt's response substantiated Henson's charge. Perhaps >> > it comes down to what one believes is the function of sex and the >> > meaning of "perverse." This is what Voigt wrote: >> >> I feel the same, but for someone who says he's a Christian, that >> response seemed a wee bit harsh, dontcha think? But then again, he >> did at least admit that. From what I've read, not even the apostles >> were perfect all the time. I guess just as long as a person >> is willing to admit their faults. TH> Yes, I agree my statement could have been worded differently, but I do TH> not take back my opinion of his action. WHAT action?? I subscribe to normal sexual behaviors as per the mainstream of society and you called me an INSANE PERVERT. You have shown yourself a very vile, hateful person with that outburst. .... 27th Rule of Creationism: Always appear to know more than you do. --- FastEcho 1.46 (reg) * Origin: The Danse - Where Norse Gods Ponder Their Navels (1:387/638) .