Subj : Rush to Judgement?
To   : JOHN WILSON
From : CONSTANCE RAWLEY
Date : Tue Oct 31 2000 04:38 pm

 
 On Oct. 31st, 2000 - John Wilson wrote to Todd Henson:
 
 JW> That we differ is way evident...I've come to enjoy your insulting
 JW> scorn and personal attacks...(I think I've come off easy, being
 JW> merely a `jerk'  ...I admit to being shocked when you called
 JW> someone a pervert; when his response showed you clearly that
 JW> such a charge was im error...
 
 
 John,
 
 While I might disagree with Todd's aggressiveness, (I'm unable to
 think of a more suitable term at the moment), after seeing Voigt's
 posts in the Matzdobre echo and some of his arguments here, I'm
 inclined to think that "pervert" is an appropriate label for the
 person you're attempting to defend. Perhaps if you had a more
 complete picture of the exchanges involving Voigt, Henson and others,
 you'd recognize that.
 
 I think Voigt's response substantiated Henson's charge. Perhaps it
 comes down to what one believes is the function of sex and the meaning
 of "perverse." This is what Voigt wrote:
 
 JV> "Fisting", BTW, is a perfectly legitimate sexual behavior, as
 JV> are sodomy, fellatio, cunnilingus, masturbation, and a host of
 JV> others. Your hangup about "fisting" (not to mention gay sex)
 JV> says a lot about you and about how you'd legislate "decency"
 JV> for all of us.
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr4
 * Origin: BBS Networks @ www.bbsnets.com 808-839-5016 (1:10/345)

.