Subj : Extent of understanding. To : Todd Henson From : John Wilson Date : Wed Oct 25 2000 12:44 am -=> TODD HENSON wrote to JOHN WILSON <=- > TH> So what? i wasn't aware that it was wrong to disagree or in any > TH> way critique ideas. > > If you think your post was a disagreement and/or a critique > of those idea, fine. (If weird and nonsensical :-) TH> My my, the unjustified indignation. Proud? Not at all. Not unjustified, not indignant, not proud. (Hence the "smiley" ...) Just amusement. :-) TH> Why so spiteful? "Ill will, with a wish to anger, annoy or defeat." Nope. Just amused. > If you continue to offer je june responses, I'll just continue in my > charming style, amused at what you consider `logical analysis'... TH> If you see me as being someone whose opinions are worthless TH> insubstantial quips, then why TH> would you feel the need to continue your insulting style? You infer my gentle reminders of reality and common sense containing wisdom and pith are "insulting"? :-) My! TH> Why not TH> just do what I have chosen to TH> do with the vast majority of Viogt's posts, and ignore them? I fear that would lead you into a terrible sense of being always correct. You have, I think, enough of that. :-) TH> Why TH> do you feel the need to pursue TH> it, and turn the echo into Holysmoke Part 2? Have you noticed that posts in this echo concerning what you call my "insults" or "Spite" are not so considered by others here? By *noone else* here? I say this not to justify myself but merely to suggest that your opinion might just not be totally correct. (I've never been to "Holysmoke"...) TH> Is that what a panentheistic hedonist would do? Get it right. :-) A realized escatological panentheist, sure. Hedonist? No, but I believe that only conscious suffering makes any sense...... Mebbie Epicurian would be close: "Do not avoid pleasures, but select them" -- ___ MultiMail/MS-DOS v0.32 --- Maximus 3.01 * Origin: The BandMaster, Vancouver, B.C., Canada (1:153/7715) .