Subj : Extent of understanding.
To   : JOHN WILSON
From : TODD HENSON
Date : Tue Oct 24 2000 12:55 am

>  TH> So what? i wasn't aware that it was wrong to disagree or in any
>  TH> way critique ideas.
> 
>      If you think your post was a disagreement and/or a critique
>      of those idea, fine. (If weird and nonsensical :-)


My my, the unjustified indignation. Proud?


>  TH> That seems
>  TH> to be a personal hang up of yours, not mine.
> 
>  Ah, thanks for the `logical analysis' :-)


It was my pleasure.


>  >  and hundreds of years...and your preemptory dismissal of this was
>  >  `logical analysis.' Man, you do sometimes really take the cake.
> 
> 
>  TH> Can you offer some intelligent commentary on the ideas being
>  TH> examined, or will you simply
>  TH> continue with the insults?
> 
>   When you offer some intelligent commentary on the ideas put forth
>   we'll converse.


Why so spiteful? 


>   If you continue to offer je june responses, I'll just continue in my
>   charming style, amused at what you consider `logical analysis'...


If you see me as being someone whose opinions are worthless insubstantial
quips, then why 
would you feel the need to continue your insulting style? Why not just do
what I have chosen to 
do with the vast majority of Viogt's posts, and ignore them? Why do you
feel the need to pursue 
it, and turn the echo into Holysmoke Part 2?

Is that what a panentheistic hedonist would do?
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr4
 * Origin: BBS Networks @ www.bbsnets.com 808-839-5016 (1:10/345)

.