Subj : Perl::JAM (was: txt2pkt.pl) To : Johan Billing From : Maurice Kinal Date : Sun Feb 20 2005 09:36 am Hey Johan! Feb 20 14:20 05, Johan Billing wrote to Maurice Kinal: JB> I would say that having a binary format at all is DOS-think. :-) Agreed. I am still dealing with that outside of Fido. The difference is that a simple bash script can be employed there (gps) since the data is well ordered and lends itself well to dynamic conversion to a more appropriate storage/archiving format. JB> Surely both storage and transport formats of fidonet messages could JB> be optimized a bit, but I doubt that it would be worth the effort. Exactly! That is why I don't wish to bother with it other then on outbound pkts to an uplink. Internally, locally or on a LAN there are more effecient ways to deal with messaging that could lend themselves well to conversion to ANY and ALL formats. Hence my comment about a reduced basic "format" the is more or less 60% of the size of a packed Fido message, containing all the needed information to create a packed message, or even JAM if that is desirable. :-) JB> By the way, I uploaded a slighly improved version of the module to JB> the server. The main difference is that it now uses Time::Zone JB> instead of JB> Time::Timezone as I think that the TimeDate package is much more JB> common than the Time-modules package. Okay. I'll probably edit that and use the POSIX localtime module instead. I find that to be the most useful and flexible overall for timedate formatting. JB> fcntl which is a pain to use in Perl and cannot be used in a portable JB> way... Understood. There are some differences and I doubt any language or scipt can be made truly portable. Good to discuss it so that future problems can be avoided wherever possible. I can adjust accordingly and when appropriate here nd always appreciate a heads up when portability issues arise. Life is good, Maurice --- Msged/LNX 6.1.2 * Origin: Coffin Point - Ladysmith, BC Canada (1:153/401.1) .