Subj : Theoretical situation
To   : Gerald Miller
From : Bob Seaborn
Date : Thu Feb 21 2002 05:01 am

 >BS> route anything throgh my system also.  However I'm yet to impliment
 >BS> anything to actively stop her.
 >
 > Cases of "behavior modification"  ???  <g, d & r>

      Sometimes, with some people even that doesn't work.  :)

 >
 >>> Maybe such a suggestion contravenes Fidonet policy, in which case,
 >>> you
 >
 >BS>             Policy requires that any _valid_ netmail routed through a
 >BS> system be either passed along it's way, or returned.  There are some
 >BS> exceptions, such as encrypted messages, and/or gated email>netmail
 >BS> traffic.  Of course, these can be done with advance permission, but NOT
 >BS> without such.
 >
 > I've been curious about this (and I will take this to netmail is you
 > should request): Permission from ALL systems within the routing?

      Yep, and since one doesn't know specifically _how_ routed netmail will
travel once it leaves the originating system, that gets kinda awkward, if not 
impossible.  :)






                       .....Bob

--- GEcho/32 & IM 2.50
 * Origin: http://www.nwstar.com (1:140/12)

.