Subj : Re: New format
To   : Sean Dennis
From : Mike Luther
Date : Mon Mar 28 2005 04:21 pm

I'm curious Sean.

 SD> I've already thought of that, actually.  The problem is, other people in 
 SD> other networks will want their addresses listed too, 
 SD> which could possibly bloat the list beyond belief.  I 
 SD> mean, the list is small now, but who knows what could 
 SD> happen - I just don't want any extra stuff on it.  
 SD> It's meant to be a simple list.  If people want 
 SD> network numbers, they can look in a nodelist or log 
 SD> onto the board to find out. :)

If the list is flat out headered as OS/2 specific BBS systems and some of it 
happens to have FidoNet addresses, who could reasonably complain? If the OS/2 
specific BBS happens to be in another network, so much more merriment, no?  But 
then again, I'm not very sensitive, I guess, as to fight-O-net and branches of 
this and that ..  I guess ..


--> Sleep well; OS/2's still awake! ;)

Mike @ 1:117/3001

--- Maximus/2 3.01
 * Origin: Ziplog Public Port (1:117/3001)

.