Subj : HTML?
To   : Scott Little
From : Kenneth Abrams
Date : Fri Nov 17 2000 01:09 pm

Hello Scott,

16 Nov 00 19:17, Scott Little wrote to MIKE RUSKAI:

 MR>> The existence of a 4.01 version of HTML does not make HTML 1.0
 MR>> invalid.

 SL> Nobody specified the version, and since the current version is around
 SL> 4....

Will a 4.whatever compliant browser have any problem reading a 1.0 document? 
Does the fact that it doesn't contain structures added by later versions mean 
it can no longer be read? Is validation against newer features relevant or 
meaningful?

 SL> I wonder what Word 1.0 would produce? Anyone got it?

Not even close to being the same thing, and you know it.


Kenneth (kabrams@olg.com)

--- GoldED/2 2.50+
 * Origin: Great Mills, Maryland (1:109/921.67)

.