Subj : New MM user w/o Linux mm To : Monica Neufeld From : James Bradley Date : Wed Feb 18 2004 05:32 pm -=> MONICA NEUFELD wrote to JAMES BRADLEY <=- > James Bradley wrote to Monica Neufeld < >-=> Quoting Monica Neufeld to James Bradley <=- > -=> JAMES BRADLEY wrote to 1WILLIAM MCBRINE on 02-03-04 00:57 <=- > > MN> If it helps any, I just uploaded the most recent versions of >[...] >Linux version handy? I tried to upload it the last time I was at an >I-Net account, but it turned out to be a dud file. MN> I went into the MultiMail site and saw the following files for Linux. MN> Please let me knowwhich one you need. I'm not familiar with Linux. MN> I'll upload a file as soon as Mike's Madhouse is back online. They MN>are, right now, experiencing some sort of technical difficulty. `Technical difficulties' must be the resource kit he's been pouring over. He has the elf file posted, but it came here as a dud. I wish I knew more about Linux, as I may be just asking you to waste your time. I will try to eliminate the obvious: MN> mm-linux-i386elf.gz (188k) - Linux/i386 ELF, now statically linked. MN> Previously I provided a binary that was dependent on libc5, but this MN> one isn't. Compiled on a 486 running kernel 2.0.36, and tested on an MN> Athlon running 2.5.7. This sounds right but??? William... I'm on Mandrake 6.0 (for the time). MN> mm-qnx-i386.gz (122k) - QNX/i386, compiled on RTP 6.0. Yes! (I think.) MN> mm-linux-alpha.gz (117k) - Linux/Alpha, compiled on Debian 3.0. MN> BeOS I don't think the Alpha processor resides here. <-; Here I thought all versions of Linux/Unix would use the same port. (Term?) I'm thinking if I could bother you for: mm-linux-i386elf.gz mm-qnx-i386.gz That should get me started. > MN> I don't recommend Blue Wave. It inserts a number in front of > MN> your To: field and a space in front of your subject field. >I noticed that too. I'm hoping that this version [2.20 R] might be >less trouble. I'm using a REPFix patch on the two installations, >but that might be rather old too. We'll find out soon if it >augments fields. I have to watch for duplicates too. I think that >might be more the fault of the mail door though. MN> Looks like your REPFix patch worked! "What along strange trip it's been." Seeing that this *is* the OFFLINE echo, maybe I can garner some answers here. BW 2.20 [R] now opens a maximum of Five messages, where it used to open only Twenty. For a stint in between, it would open the full compliment. Version 2.30 [NR] seemed to do the same Twenty message stunt, but when it did decide to work on all the messages, it augmented thefields as Monica suggested. (Mainly random numbers in front of the `To:' field.) I just noticed that REPFix isn't installed onthe 2.3 machine yet. That should fix the inserts, but why might the reader stop at seemingly arbitrary message numbers? Thesame file would report either Five, Twenty, or the full compliment of messages. W98 on both a Celeron 366 w/128M RAM, and a K6-2 w/128M RAM machines. ....And what-up with the augmented tear lines? Is it me that causes that? MN> * Origin: AlleyCat! BBS Surrey, BC (alleycat.ath.cx) (1:153/304) MN> 146 02/12/0404:32JAMES BRADLEY MILES MN> MAXTED Re: Pointers 0 5 MN> ᜠ--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.46 --- Mystic BBS v1.07.3 (DOS) * Origin: MikE'S MaDHousE -- WelComE to the AsYluM! (1:134/11) .