Subj : Re: Thanks
To   : KEN HRYNCHUK
From : William McBrine
Date : Mon Feb 02 2004 10:41 am

-=> KEN HRYNCHUK wrote to WILLIAM MCBRINE <=-

 KH> ... I guess I wouldn't be missing much by switching to the PM version.
 KH> I don't really like upgrading, though, and actually prefer running
 KH> less complex (which usually translates to "older") software.

Again, the XT version is no less complex than the 32-bit versions. In fact,
it's slightly moreso, as it includes the limitmem() function, the spawno
code, and a call to setdisk(). Granted, the "DOS" version has a DPMI
client/server attached, which I'm sure is fairly complex, if you want to
count that. :-)

 KH> Regarding the XT version's inability to release time-slices (related to
 KH> "ClockMode"), perhaps an inline call to Int 2FH, Function 1680H could
 KH> be of help? I'd be happy to test it, here (in Windows 95/DOS).

My official position is that, if you're running Windows 95, then you should 
be running the DOS or Win32 port of MultiMail.

.... People say I'm apathetic, but I don't care.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.46
 * Origin: COMM Port OS/2 juge.com 204.89.247.1 (281) 980-9671 (1:106/2000)

.