Subj : Bush and the Separation of Church and St To : HEAVY METAL From : TODD HENSON Date : Tue Feb 13 2001 05:45 pm > SGID: 1:138/5666 3A89A973 > TH> Hello. Taking the following hostile statements by Moebuis, I would > TH> like tocall it to your > TH> attention. > > Let's take a look... > > > Christians are the most biased - prejudiced - of anyone on the planet, > > except possibly for the Middle Eastern peoples on either side. You're not > > Generally speaking, I think he may well be quite right. I've encountered many > a Christian that were very biased & prejudiced. Then again, I've also > encountered many pagans that were (and are) as well. Then your last sentence just invalidated the validity of the first one. > > Liar. Your kind has called pagans evil from time immemorial, simply > > because we refuse to believe your way. > > Todd, have you ever been around a fellow Christan who considered everyone not > follwing their path to be evil? Many of us Pagans/Wiccans have. Why not take > a moment and look at things from a different pair of glasses, and see how the > world reacts to someone who's different...might do you some good. The "world"? Then you're talking about a universal human problem, rather than a problem that is specific to any one religion. Which again bolsters my statement, that his assertions are from ignorance and petty bias. > > Another lie. We're not denying anyone anything, we're demanding the same > > levels of respect. You're denying your own Lord and Savior. If you have > > to ask how, you'll never accept the answer. > > Again, I think he's hit the nail on the head. You gotta give a little respect > in order to get it. Again, his assertions are unsubstantiated. Not to mention hypocritical, in light of the way that he took a socio-political discussion centered around Bush's prayer into a personal ego battle. You should rethink your findings and try to be more balanced. > > Hypocrite. Calling names destroys credibility. > > Dunno. DID you call him names? You tell me. > Relax Todd, you don't always have to have things go your way. Besides, many of > us in here are thinking that you're being anal retentive. As for me, I'm > beginning to wonder if you actually have an anus. Take a look at the sum total of your reply here. It was very surface, superficial. Nothing more than a basic "I agree with Moebuis", along with that last insult at the end. Again, this particular thread started when someone posted an article that was full of liberal nonsense, and I challenged the ideas. Then someone else, in a fit of immaturity, showed that he was unable to actually deal with what was posted in the article, and began a personal attack. Then you chimed in and voiced agreement over the aforementioned immaturity, as well as adding in some of your own. In short, you're like he is - rather than being able to deal with the actual topic, you chose to take the low road. --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5 * Origin: BBS Networks @ www.bbsnets.com 808-839-5016 (1:10/345) .