Subj : XML
To   : andrew clarke
From : Jasen Betts
Date : Mon Jan 06 2003 04:09 pm

Hi andrew.

05-Jan-03 17:00:44, andrew clarke wrote to Frank Vest


 ac> Sat 2003-01-04 21:16, Frank Vest (1:124/6308.1) wrote to Jan
 ac> Vermeulen:

  >> There's nothing wrong with the SLF Nodelist. The problem is the
  >> implementing of IP. That was not done right to begin with. :(

 ac> It can be fixed.  :-)

  >> With PSTN, each mailer is expected to be able to transfer mail at
  >> least at FTS-1 (x-modem?).

 ac> Xmodem with TeLink extensions.

  >> With IP, there is no minimum required transfer method. This means
  >> that each protocol (binkp, telnet and such) has to have a flag in
  >> the Nodelist.

 ac> Are there any other common IP protocols other than BinkP & Telnet
 ac> (ie. FTS-1 over Vmodem or equivalent)
 protocol count  comment
 IFCICO   284    dunno
 FTP      182    nothing like FTS1.

 ac> You may as well make BinkP the minimum protocol.

yeah it seem most popular, what sort of software licence is involved?

 -=> Bye <=-

---
 * Origin: How to make Kleenex dance? Blow a little boogie in it. (3:640/1042)

.