Subj : human-readable nodelist format
To   : Scott Little
From : Jan Vermeulen
Date : Mon Jan 06 2003 01:58 am

    Quoting Scott Little on Mon 6 Jan 2003  7:20 to Jan Vermeulen:

 sl> Stupid arguement.

 sl> Stupid arguement.

 sl> Stupid arguement.

 sl> Stupid arguement.

 sl> Stupid arguement.

    I must have had one of these off days. Sorry for that.

 sl> You seem to have a problem understanding that XML or any other new
 sl> format is not just a rearrangement of the old one.  You're
 sl> expecting something for nothing, and it's not going to happen.  A
 sl> new format has "MORE FEATURES, MORE EASY, MORE SHINY!" and it's
 sl> going to get bigger as a result.  *This is the desired outcome*  If
 sl> you don't like it, then stay with SLF and all it's limitations.

    I may still have my off day, 'coz I did not see any new features, no more 
ease and my screen is still as dull as it was before. All I saw was more room 
for the same data.

    In another posting I have explainend what logistic problems can be expected 
from the dual nodelist project you propose.

    I would have liked it to be different and thus I will continue to find ways 
of improvement, step by step in order not to break the net.


    -=<[ JV ]>=-

 
* Origin: The Poor Man's Workstation -- Wormerveer NL (2:280/100)

.