Subj : XML To : Jan Vermeulen From : Frank Vest Date : Sat Jan 04 2003 09:16 pm On (04 Jan 03) Jan Vermeulen wrote to Micael Bulow... Hello Jan, JV> JV>> Do you really think that a nodelist is the place to start? mb> No. Actually I dont quite get why everyone is starting there. JV> Because the loudest voices are about problems with their nodes JV> entry; I am still waiting for a list telling me the who, what and why JV> of those problems. Just my humble opinion. There's nothing wrong with the SLF Nodelist. The problem is the implementing of IP. That was not done right to begin with. :( With PSTN, each mailer is expected to be able to transfer mail at least at FTS-1 (x-modem?). With IP, there is no minimum required transfer method. This means that each protocol (binkp, telnet and such) has to have a flag in the Nodelist. To "fix" this, a means needs to be made for IP mailers to determine the protocol to use during the/a connection. IOW, my IP mailer contacts your IP mailer and figures out what protocol to use. A minimum protocol would also be needed which all IP mailers use. Is this going to happen?? Probably not. :-( Can you imagine what Fidonet would have been if PSTN mailer-A only used zedzap and PSTN mailer-B only used x-modem? Just look at the IP mailers and you can see. Had there been no standards set for minimum connectivity, PSTN would be like IP is today. Each Node entry in the Nodelist would have to fly a flag for each protocol supported. EG: a flag for x-modem, zedzap, emsi and all the others. Again, just my humble opinion. Frank http://pages.sbcglobal.net/flv http://biseonline.com/r19 --- PPoint 3.01 * Origin: Holy Cow! I'm A Point!! (1:124/6308.1) .