Subj : The Nodelist Revisited
To   : Bill Birrell
From : Scott Little
Date : Tue Dec 31 2002 04:46 pm

 [ 31 Dec 02 00:17, Bill Birrell wrote to Scott Little ]

 BB>     Scott, I have very little to say. All you had to say was that the
 BB> system you advocate would run in parallel with the standard
 BB> distribution nodelist.

My first message to you was:

 BB>> The nodelist cannot be significantly altered or superseded while we
 BB>> are still using the term FidoNet anyway. To do so would just cut off
 BB>> everyone who depends on the nodelist as it is.

 SL>Extracting the subset of information that is supported by SLF from a
 SL>superior format is trivally easy.  Nobody has ever suggested
 SL>cutting off those that depend on SLF.

If you couldn't understand what I said above, a simply "Huh?" would have 
sufficed.  Instead you started crapping on about the apocalypse..


-- Scott Little  [fidonet#3:712/848 / sysgod@sysgod.org]

--- FMail/Win32 1.60+
 * Origin:  Cyberia: All your msgbase are belong to us! (3:712/848)

.