Subj : proposed new nodelist                                    [2]
To   : Neil Walker
From : mark lewis
Date : Wed Jul 17 2002 07:21 pm

 NW>>> Besides, I've yet to come across a program that
 NW>>> amkes any use of that field in the nodelist other
 NW>>> than to simply display it. ;-) It's more for human
 NW>>> readability than anything else.

 ml>> my FrontDoor sure makes use of it... i've settings
 ml>> to call systems with speeds above and below certain
 ml>> thresholds... i can even set up certain modem inits
 ml>> based on the speed field, if i need to...

 NW> Considering the nodelist can only contain speeds up to 9600

where do you get that "can only contain" from?? FTS-0005 states differently... 
and FTS-5000 also states differently... and we won't even go into the reasons 
why MAKENL has a specific verb allowing for additional connect speeds to be 
allowed...

 NW> (yes, I know Zone 1 does it's own thing ;-) ),

i just named three reasons why that's not totally true...

 NW> the other modem flags are far more useful for that.

that's all fine and good... however, if i never want to directly contact a 
system that can only do 9600, then i can block that or whatever...

 NW> I also need to seperate calls according to the receivers
 NW> capability (ISDN, V34, V32, etc.) and I do it with those
 NW> flags.

show me which of those flags is the one that indicates 9600? i, too, can make 
adjustments based on the flags...

my POINT in this was to prove to you that the SPEED field ~is~ useful and not 
there just for human convienience...

)\/(ark

 
* Origin: (1:3634/12)
--- SBBSecho/Win32 v2.00
 * Origin: Baddog BBS (1:218/903)

.