Subj : Re: Newsgroup replies to To : Digital Man From : Tharius Date : Wed Aug 31 2005 01:58 pm "Digital Man" wrote in message news:431562A2.9099.dove-hlp@vert.synchro.net... > > > > but they had a point) that my reader was posting replies to ALL > > > > instead > > > > locals and in dovenet just fine, with the TO field being the person > > > > I'm > > > > responding to, however, my fidonet echomail is responding to ALL > we're talkinga bout RFC822 message-ID's here, not FTN message-IDs. I was just trying to translate it down :) Part of the nntp message header format. They're linking back and forth between > > > "O, H" command from the reading message prompt. And your reply message > > > in OE should have a "in-reply-to" header field which matches the > > > original > > > messages "rfc822msgid" field. I don' t see anything that says in-reply-to but found the msgid and replyid. > > If I delete the news: part would that screw up the lookup? > No. The header fields are in the "invisible" part of the message. Editing > the > message body text will have no effect on this lookup. I didn't think that would affect it but it seemed a relevant thing to ask. Original post : Sync 3.12a RFC822MsgID <430F2B83.1.fidobbsdoord@aceshigh.dyn.dhs.org> PID says Synchronet 3.12a, this was a remote reply to my message. We have an ID match, and ok to/from > > RFC822ReplyID <430F2B83.1.fidobbsdoord@aceshigh.dyn.dhs.org> No RFC MSG ID on the header. My reply to the above message, via OE NNTP (displays as To ALL, no inbound msg id to match starts new?) > > RFC822ReplyID <4310E279.2.fidobbsdoord@aceshigh.dyn.dhs.org> > > RFC822MsgID <43111DB3.3.fidobbsdoord@aceshigh.dyn.dhs.org> PID says Synchronet 3.12a, this was a remote reply to my message. We have an ID match, and ok to/from > > RFC822ReplyID <43111DB3.3.fidobbsdoord@aceshigh.dyn.dhs.org> No RFC MSG ID on the header. My reply to the above message, via OE NNTP (displays as To ALL, no inbound msg id to match starts new?) > > RFC822ReplyID <4311FBC6.4.fidobbsdoord@aceshigh.dyn.dhs.org> > > RFC822MsgID <43132772.5.fidobbsdoord@aceshigh.dyn.dhs.org> > It's not clear to me which of those messages was posted via NNTP and which > weren't, so I don't really know what to say. I hope the above is more helpful. > If you post a reply via NNTP and the RFC822ReplyID field matches the > original > message's RFC822MsgID field, then the "to" user should be automatically > set > accordingly. I'm understanding. The threading makes perfect sence. So I guess the question becomes why the replies to my messages are not carrying rfc msg id's on them? --- þ Synchronet þ [aceshigh.dyn.dhs.org] - Come fly our friendly skies! .