Subj : Re: Windows issues To : Angus Mcleod From : Finnigann Date : Fri Jun 10 2005 05:52 pm -=> With interpidation and the MAGIC of QWK Mail Angus Mcleod wrote to Finnigann <=- AM> Re: Re: Windows issues AM> By: Finnigann to Digital Man on Fri Jun 10 2005 06:40:00 > DM> Such programs are hogwash. Read http://tinyurl.com/9jzuo for > DM> details. > > Interesting reading. However the problem remains, when an app says it > cannot run for lack of resources... what do you do? AM> Make more RAM available by eliminating programs with large AM> working-sets, or by buying more RAM. You don't seem to have read the link DM gave. Part of the rather long web page explained why RAM defragers (or as I was hoping for; Ram restorers) is a myth. And the rest of the article said that if you have xx% free ram, you are wasting xx%. Well that sort of makes sense, but not logically. Of course I tend to trail back on the understanding parts. It has been my understanding that Windows apps fail to restore all of the allocated resources upon exiting. They are thus lost to the system. Eventually you must reboot your computer in order to recalim them. Every version of Windows claims to fix this problem. AM> I've always been amused by the idea of "de-fragmenting" RAM in a AM> system that used demand-paged virtual memory. Or paged memory of AM> any kind, actually, although paging systems other than AM> demand-paging with virtualization are not too easy to find any AM> more, for obvious reasons..... Defragmenting RAM may be a misnomer. If anyone has MORE insight on this, I would be fasinated to read about it. [Keep in mind lay persons are also reading here] ³ James King KC8UGV ³ ³ Sysop Bits-N-Bytes BBS ³ ³ Coldwater, MI 49036 ³ http://www.synchro.net/sbbslist.html³ If the Republicans will stop telling lies about us, we'll stop telling the truth about them." .... Just wondering... there's a sign post up ahead... what's it say? --- MultiMail/Win32 v0.45 þ Synchronet þ Bits-N-Bytes BBS Onehellofa BBS bnb.dtdns.net .