Subj : Looking into HAMing... To : Angus McLeod From : Deuce Date : Thu Aug 18 2005 11:44 pm Re: Looking into HAMing... By: Angus McLeod to Deuce on Thu Aug 18 2005 21:05:00 > > 1) Do I really need 9600baud for the TNC? As I understand it, it's only > > useable on 2m and since I'm relatively speaking in the boonies (south-eas > > saskatchewan) I'm not sure if there's enough digipeters around for anyone > > actually use it there... was thinking of using 20 or 30m for that so I do > > expect more than 1200baud... am I off base on anything in there (Haven't > > into packet too much, just know I'd want to play with it) > > I have a TNC that will do 9600 baud and used to access the PACSATs with > it. It is a legitimate option, even if you have simple omni- antennas. > You won't get much 9600 baud traffic on HF, so if youreally only want to > use HF you won't need 9600 baud capability. > > > 2) Do I want a dedicated tranceiver for the TNC? I expect to have even l > > calls via packet than I get via telnet (ie: statistically zero) so is it > > even thinking about? > > Understand this: *NOBODY* will call you on packet. Packet has > degenerated into a network of unatended nodes sending message traffic back > and forth. You can post messages/bulletins, and read those posted by > others, but there is very little keyboard-to-keyboard traffic on packet. > Particularly on HF. Of course, if you and a few friends decide to become > active on packet, you can create your own sked for that work. But if you > want to set up a packet message node (BBS) then you will want a separate > rig for it, because once it's set up you won't wnat to take it offline for > 30 minutes while you switch to the repeater for a ragchew. But if you do > *not* intend to operate a packet node, then you can manage with one rig > for everything. That's what I figured... not even sure if 9600 would even be theoretically possibly on HF. But since 4800 and lower TNCs can be had for around $10 and 9600 is around $50, was curious if it was something I should spring for just in case. Sounds like a no. I was pondering setting up a node for Synchronet... with a low bandwidth menu set etc. But as I said, since I expect no callers, it seems like a bit of a waste perhaps maybe. Thing is that since I'll probobly do most/all of my shopping at one time (I need to got at least 120 miles to the nearest swap meet) I just want a vauge idea of what I'm looking for. --- þ Synchronet þ ``Penguins make tasty snacks'' .