Subj : FCC Deregulating HAMradio To : Mike From : Spaceman Spiff Date : Sat Jul 31 2004 11:20 am Re: FCC Deregulating HAMradio By: Mike to Spaceman Spiff on Sat Apr 03 2004 09:15 am > Re: FCC Deregulating HAMradio > By: Spaceman Spiff to All on Fri Apr 02 2004 09:33 pm > > > FCC to Deregulate Amateur Radio by 2008: > > from AF! on April 1, 2004 > > View comments about this article! > > > > Wasshington, DC, April 1, 2004: > > > > In a bold move the Federall Communications Commission has decided to dere > > the Amateur Radio Service. This comes at a time when budget cuts within t > > Commission are forcing its Enforcement Bureau to shut down by 1 January 2 > > > > A spokesperson for the Commission stated that since Amateur Radio operato > > supposed to be self-policing that this new move "should not pose a proble > > And that it would also "solve the whole issue of restructuring". > > > > This news has come as quite a shock to many in the Amateur Radio communit > > striking up many heated debates. "Basically we're being told that we're o > > own as of 1 January, 2008", said a high-level League staff member. > > > > In the interim between 2004 and 2008 Amateur Radio operators are expected > > act just as they do now. "Nothing's changed yet, and all the rules and > > regulations are still in effect," said a spokesperson for the Commission. > > > > All of this is set to change however, starting in 2008. On 1 January 2008 > > Amateur Radio in the United States will cease to exist as an official rad > > service. At that time it will be up to the operators to make up their own > > and regulations and to enforce them. > > > > To clarify one other issue, "call signs that have not already been issued > > all be available on the 'honor system'," said another Commission spokespe > > The band-plans and power limitations are expected to stay the same. > > > > Look for more information on this late-breaking news story as it becomes > > available. > > > > > > > > > > > > On another note... If you're still reading this, April Fools!!! :^) > > > > Lol you got me. > Mike > > Yep that was a good one. :) .