Subj : Re: FAILURE
To   : Finnigann
From : richardw
Date : Thu Oct 06 2005 10:19 am

  Re: Re: FAILURE
  By: Finnigann to Ralph Smole on Wed Oct 05 2005 01:12 am

 >  >  >  > What ails me is that when Clinton had his bout with legalities for 
 >  >  >  > under oath' about his connection with Monica, but nothing's being b
 >  >  >  > about lying for a reason to incite war and occupy a third world cou
 >  >  >
 >  >  > You have evidence that Bush was lying about the intelligence indicatin
 >  >  > were WMD in Iraq?  If so, the American public would love to see that (
 >  >  > as the intelligence agencies that were responsible for the erroneous
 >  >  > information).  Please do cite your sources.
 >  >
 >  >   You must be joking.
 >  >
 >  >   You simply MUST be.
 >  >
 >  >
 >  >        [daemon]
 >  >        In the shuffling madness...
 >  >
 >  >
 >  >
 >  RS> No,he's not. Prove without a shadow of a doubt that he is guilty.
 > 
 > The phrase is '...beyond a reasonable doubt'

Why should the standards for the president be any different than the 
standards applied for the death penalty?

 > But how can anyone do that when you and Jazzman and richardw refuse to read 
 > info provided.

You have no idea what I've read.  Just because I've read something doesn't 
mean it will change my perspective.

---
 þ Synchronet þ Eleemosynary ELF - eelf.richardw.net

.