Subj : Re: Um...no comment?
To   : richardw
From : Finnigann
Date : Mon Sep 19 2005 11:48 pm

-=> richardw wrote to Mrproper <=-

 ri>   Re: Re: Um...no comment?
 ri>   By: Mrproper to Angus McLeod on Mon Sep 19 2005 03:22 am

 >  > You think I was talking about you personally?  Or generalizing, like when
 >  > you said "rich fuckers" as if all people who make more than a figure
 >  > approved by *you* are automatically "fuckers"?
 >
 > No, I don't beleive you was speaking of me personally, Just as I don't belie
 > ALL rich people are "fuckers" but yeah, most of them are..

 ri> Herein lies your problem.  You have no faith in people.  You
 ri> demonstrate a jealousy that makes you biased.  I believe most "rich"
 ri> people to be of much better quality than most "poor" people.  And I'm
 ri> not saying this from a biased perspective, I'm not rich.


I can see your point, in some cases prejudice[1] is indicated while in others
it's not.




[1]
prej·u·dice  
An adverse judgment or opinion formed beforehand or without knowledge 
or examination of the facts.

A preconceived preference

....but then again maybe not.


  ΥΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝΝ
  ³ "We live in a society exquisitely dependent on science and technology,
  ³  in which hardly anyone knows anything about science and technology."
  ³                    - Carl Sagan
  ³


.... The number you have dailed...Nine-one-one...has been changed.
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.46
 ώ Synchronet ώ Bits-N-Bytes BBS    Onehellofa BBS     bnb.dtdns.net

.