Subj : Re: Um...no comment?
To   : richardw
From : Daemon
Date : Tue Sep 20 2005 12:22 am

  Re: Re: Um...no comment?
  By: richardw to Finnigann on Mon Sep 19 2005 11:09 am

 >   [1m[34mRe[0m[34m: [1m[36mRe: Um...no comment?
 >   [34mBy[0m[34m: [1m[36mFinnigann [34mto [36mFrank Reid [34mon [36m
 > 
 >  >  > And so many charitys have been found to be little more than scams poss
 >  >  > charity.
 >  >  >
 >  >  > Can we not do better?
 >  >
 >  >  FR> You think the federal government could do better at dispensing
 >  >  FR> charities than churches, the Red Cross, Salvation Army, etc.?!
 >  >
 >  > Well yawl. They have more money. And they don't require religious afiliat
 >  > either.
 > 
 > Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors... and
 > miss. -- Robert A. Heinlein
 > [0m

  lol...  Sounds quite a bit like something Samuel Clemmens would have said.

---
 þ Synchronet þ Necropolis - necropolisbbs.darktech.org

.