Subj : Re: Um...no comment?
To   : Angus McLeod
From : Finnigann
Date : Sun Sep 18 2005 01:02 pm

-=> Angus McLeod wrote to Mrproper <=-

 AM>   Re: Re: Um...no comment?
 AM>   By: Mrproper to Finnigann on Sun Sep 18 2005 10:13:00

 >  > Why? The only standards they need meet is to be poorer than 90% of everyo
 >  > else. But see Frank for details (if there are any more)
 >
 > If it is beleieved to be that way if one of you rich fuckers try to touch me
 > you have a war on your hands.

 AM> The rich are always fuckers, right?  But in my experience, the poor are
 AM> all aimless, lazy breeders, sitting around complaining about how their
 AM> rich-fucker-sponsored handout is late being delivered to their door.

 AM> Okay, so sometimes you are unable to get a job and can't do anything
 AM> all day other than smoke rock cocaine and screw your sister.  But why
 AM> is it the concern and/or responsibility of someone ELSE to see you get
 AM> money for beer and porno-DVD rentals?



I think in this case rich is the adjective and fuckers the noun. Not visa
ersa.


    "We live in a society exquisitely dependent on science and technology,
     in which hardly anyone knows anything about science and technology."
                       - Carl Sagan



.... If you don't mind the messenger, Kids are pretty kool!
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.46
 þ Synchronet þ Bits-N-Bytes BBS    Onehellofa BBS     bnb.dtdns.net

.