Subj : Re: Um...no comment? To : Frank Reid From : Finnigann Date : Sun Sep 18 2005 12:53 pm -=> Frank Reid wrote to Frank <=- FR> Re: Re: Um...no comment? FR> By: Frank to Frank Reid on Sun Sep 18 2005 00:18:00 > Yes you are right. The move to open US markets to prescription drugs from > Canada speaks volumes. The fact that we should even have to consider such > a thing tells us where we are. I don't know what steps we can take in this > area, too much money is being thrown at politics to STOP change. FR> Pharmaceutical companies make profit, and they're going to continue to FR> make profit by developing other means, if necessary. If 50% of their FR> net profit results from U.S. drug sales, and half that market goes away FR> because the U.S. starts buying foreign-market intended drugs, they will FR> immediately increase costs for foreign-market intended drugs. I believe (at least in the case of Canada) that they have made the best deals they can. It's OUR gov that has been the major factor in NOT helping out where it could, in regards to pricing and purchasing drugs. FR> Unless it's your desire either that the government itself takes over FR> the pharmaceutical manufacturing industry *or* that the industry FR> becomes socially regulated in price, then avoiding U.S. costs by buying FR> the same products overseas will *not* solve the problem. They could split the difference and act as purchasing agent and negotiate the lowest prices they could. Why not use the mass buying power and get cost cutting prices for people that must have them. Of course the rest of us wouldn't mind lower drug costs either. Either the gov steps in and supports the people or they stand back and support the drug companies. "We live in a society exquisitely dependent on science and technology, in which hardly anyone knows anything about science and technology." - Carl Sagan .... It's lonely at the top, but you eat better. --- MultiMail/Win32 v0.46 þ Synchronet þ Bits-N-Bytes BBS Onehellofa BBS bnb.dtdns.net .