Subj : Re: Um...no comment?
To   : richardw
From : Finnigann
Date : Thu Sep 15 2005 11:37 pm

-=> richardw wrote to Finnigann <=-

 ri>   Re: Re: Um...no comment?
 ri>   By: Finnigann to richardw on Thu Sep 15 2005 02:11 pm

 >  >  >  ri> The PRIMARY reason I don't like "Death" taxes... I don't like the
 >  >  >  ri> of the government reaping the rewards of it's own citizen's death
 >  >  >
 >  >  > Why do you specify DEATH taxes? You don't like to pay for anything.
 >  >
 >  >  ri> You're just ignorant.
 >  >
 >  > Right, I AM ignorant, just not as ignorant as you are...
 >  > And you're parsimonious.
 >
 >  ri> You contine to insult me because I choose to "give" via a private
 >  ri> charity as opposed to the government forcing me, or anyone else, to
 >  ri> "give."  Since you have no clue as to my financial doings, I would
 >  ri> appreciate you not commenting.  Ignoramus.
 >
 > Hey, you're the one that brought up the money issue.

 ri> This is incorrect.  See above, you accused me of not liking to pay for
 ri> anything.

You have made several comments about how you regret the federal government
spending 'YOUR' money. (How it's spent seems to mek little deifference.
Although I can't recall you carping aobout the billions spent on WAR and the
militry.


 > Perhaps you didn't intend
 > to be so forth comming.

 ri> What are you refering to here? 	I've meant everything I've said.

Your comments on Your money going where it might help people.

 > Anyway, it a BIG thing for most people.

 ri> Agreed.  Most people don't like being told to give their money to their
 ri> neighbors.

 > Hint for future messages, if you don't care to participate - don't.

 ri> I love to participate.  Although I usually try to do so without doling
 ri> out insults.  


Well that's not always been the case.

 ri> I took your commnent, "You don't like to pay for
 ri> anything" as an insult.  Perhaps you didn't mean it like that, and
 ri> you were actually commenting on my ability to manage money. What
 ri> exactly are you trying to infer with this suggestion?

It has been a reoccouring theme in your messages (about taxes) that you regret
it's being spent in one way or another. Then you often times  slip in some
derrogatory remark for follow on messages.

It's ALL opinions here (and most of the links provided).

I think a good prupose of government is to help people that can't help
themselves. The Feds are not supposed to show favoritism on racial lines or
gender or background, religious prefferences or life styles. Where as private
funding/aide can (and does) often restrict such aide and can and often times
does with draw such aide.

Federal assistance is supposed to be fair and balanced. And I suspect that is
what really chaps people butts about it.

It supposed to be ...  "government of the people, by the people, for the
people" At least Lincoln thought so.


.... Maybe you should put the speakers on the inside - Mike
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.46
 þ Synchronet þ Bits-N-Bytes BBS    Onehellofa BBS     bnb.dtdns.net

.