Subj : Re: Um...no comment?
To   : Finnigann
From : richardw
Date : Thu Sep 15 2005 09:54 am

  Re: Re: Um...no comment?
  By: Finnigann to richardw on Wed Sep 14 2005 06:45 pm

 >  >  >  >  > Any particular reason the assets couldn't have been jointly held
 >  >  >  >  > and his wife?
 >  >  >  >
 >  >  >  > Any particular reason why they should have?
 >  >  >
 >  >  >  De> Because, in this hypothetical world, if they didn't share control
 >  >  >  De> the assets, they would effectively all be confiscated by the gove
 >  >  >  De> on his death.  Sounds like a good reason to have a wife you trust
 >  >  >  De> children you get along with.
 >  >  >
 >  >  > Hopefully raising such a family AND making the million plus to be of i
 >  >  > to the IRS is possilbe.
 >  >
 >  >  ri> The PRIMARY reason I don't like "Death" taxes... I don't like the id
 >  >  ri> of the government reaping the rewards of it's own citizen's deaths.
 >  >
 >  >
 >  > Why do you specify DEATH taxes? You don't like to pay for anything.
 > 
 >  ri> You're just ignorant.
 > 
 > Right, I AM ignorant, just not as ignorant as you are...
 > And you're parsimonious.

You contine to insult me because I choose to "give" via a private charity 
as opposed to the government forcing me, or anyone else, to "give."  Since 
you have no clue as to my financial doings, I would appreciate you not 
commenting.  Ignoramus.

---
 þ Synchronet þ Eleemosynary ELF - eelf.richardw.net

.