Subj : Re: Um...no comment?
To   : Finnigann
From : richardw
Date : Wed Sep 14 2005 10:17 am

  Re: Re: Um...no comment?
  By: Finnigann to richardw on Tue Sep 13 2005 06:53 pm

 >  >  >  > Any particular reason the assets couldn't have been jointly held be
 >  >  >  > and his wife?
 >  >  >
 >  >  > Any particular reason why they should have?
 >  >
 >  >  De> Because, in this hypothetical world, if they didn't share control of
 >  >  De> the assets, they would effectively all be confiscated by the governm
 >  >  De> on his death.  Sounds like a good reason to have a wife you trust an
 >  >  De> children you get along with.
 >  >
 >  > Hopefully raising such a family AND making the million plus to be of inte
 >  > to the IRS is possilbe.
 > 
 >  ri> The PRIMARY reason I don't like "Death" taxes... I don't like the idea
 >  ri> of the government reaping the rewards of it's own citizen's deaths.
 > 
 > 
 > Why do you specify DEATH taxes? You don't like to pay for anything.

You're just ignorant.

---
 þ Synchronet þ Eleemosynary ELF - eelf.richardw.net

.