Subj : Re: Um...no comment?
To   : richardw
From : Finnigann
Date : Tue Sep 13 2005 06:53 pm

-=> richardw wrote to Finnigann <=-

 ri>   Re: Re: Um...no comment?
 ri>   By: Finnigann to Deuce on Tue Sep 13 2005 06:53 am

 >  >  > Any particular reason the assets couldn't have been jointly held betwe
 >  >  > and his wife?
 >  >
 >  > Any particular reason why they should have?
 >
 >  De> Because, in this hypothetical world, if they didn't share control of
 >  De> the assets, they would effectively all be confiscated by the government
 >  De> on his death.  Sounds like a good reason to have a wife you trust and
 >  De> children you get along with.
 >
 > Hopefully raising such a family AND making the million plus to be of interes
 > to the IRS is possilbe.

 ri> The PRIMARY reason I don't like "Death" taxes... I don't like the idea
 ri> of the government reaping the rewards of it's own citizen's deaths.


Why do you specify DEATH taxes? You don't like to pay for anything.

.... I need someone really bad... are you really bad?
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.46
 þ Synchronet þ Bits-N-Bytes BBS    Onehellofa BBS     bnb.dtdns.net

.