Subj : Re: Um...no comment?
To   : Deuce
From : Finnigann
Date : Tue Sep 13 2005 06:53 am

-=> Deuce wrote to Angus McLeod <=-

 De>   Re: Re: Um...no comment?
 De>   By: Angus McLeod to Deuce on Tue Sep 13 2005 00:19:00

 >  > Any particular reason the assets couldn't have been jointly held between
 >  > and his wife?
 >
 > Any particular reason why they should have?

 De> Because, in this hypothetical world, if they didn't share control of
 De> the assets, they would effectively all be confiscated by the government
 De> on his death.  Sounds like a good reason to have a wife you trust and
 De> children you get along with.

Hopefully raising such a family AND making the million plus to be of interest
to the IRS is possilbe.

.... It IS as BAD as you think and they ARE out to get you.
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.46
 þ Synchronet þ Bits-N-Bytes BBS    Onehellofa BBS     bnb.dtdns.net

.