Subj : Re: Um...no comment?
To   : Angus McLeod
From : Deuce
Date : Tue Sep 13 2005 01:58 am

  Re: Re: Um...no comment?
  By: Angus McLeod to Deuce on Tue Sep 13 2005 00:19:00

 >  > Any particular reason the assets couldn't have been jointly held between 
 >  > and his wife?
 > 
 > Any particular reason why they should have?

Because, in this hypothetical world, if they didn't share control of the
assets, they would effectively all be confiscated by the government on his
death.  Sounds like a good reason to have a wife you trust and children you get
along with.

---
 þ Synchronet þ ``Penguins make tasty snacks''

.