Subj : Re: Um...no comment?
To   : Finnigann
From : Richardw
Date : Mon Sep 12 2005 12:22 pm

  Re: Re: Um...no comment?
  By: Finnigann to Richardw on Mon Sep 12 2005 03:22 pm

 > -=> Richardw wrote to Deuce <=-
 > 
 >  Ri>   Re: Re: Um...no comment?
 >  Ri>   By: Deuce to Frank Reid on Fri Sep 09 2005 09:00 pm
 > 
 >  >   Re: Re: Um...no comment?
 >  >   By: Frank Reid to Frank on Fri Sep 09 2005 20:48:00
 >  >
 >  >  >  >    If it's a subject that ran aground recently then I'll get off it
 >  >  >
 >  >  > Nah, not trying to discourage you from posting on the topic whatsoever
 >  >  > think it's a good (and necessary) thing to redistribute wealth.  Other
 >  >  > uphill "sucking" would very quickly leave a vacuum at the bottom, and 
 >  >  > be serfs working on some baron's land!
 >  >
 >  > Bah, tax people when they die.  Just make a flat 95% tax on estates.
 >  >
 > 
 >  Ri> You are one twisted individual.
 > 
 > What?? I'm not very smart but I can think of ways around that already. Just
 > give your kids everything in a trustfund and allow your self a living expens
 > for the taxman to fight over.

You're even more twisted that Duece.  Let's design a tax, then think of ways
around it!  What's the matter with a flat 10% income tax?  Or how about a flat
10% sales tax?  Everybody pay the same percentage.

.