Subj : Re: Hurricane recovery To : Newborn From : richardw Date : Fri Sep 09 2005 10:36 am Re: Re: Hurricane recovery By: Newborn to richardw on Fri Sep 09 2005 01:00 am > > > > Perhaps local law enforcement might not have been so warn-out if GI > > > > standing along side of him. Police handleing the law and the milita > > > > him up. Sounds good to me. > > > > > > Utimately this is what happened, it just took the bureacy (local, st > > > federal) a while to figure it out. I really think 'lumping' FEMA in > > > basket as Homeland security is a griveous error. FEMA should be a s > > > agency responsibile for NATURAL disaster ONLY. With a separate budg > > > a leader that has experience with coping with natural disasters. > > > > I disagree. We need one response team capable of dealing with whatever > > disaster comes along. The response is similiar *irregardless* of the > > cause. Provide a means of evacuation, food, medicine, shelter, and > > apparently some baby-sitting at gun-point may be required as well. > > > > I don't see the need to fund 2 seperate agencies. Everybody today seems > > to think we need a BIGGER government than the monolith we have now! > > ugh! > > FEMA doesn't have to be concerned with ongoing acts of terrorism, such > as radioaactive (atomic) or chemical acts that homeland security would > have to handle. Natural disasters are quite different and require people > experienced in handling the problems they present. It may not require a > different agency, but, each department should have it's own leadership > structure. Just my personal opinion.... We're talking about _response_ teams. FEMA should be concerned with responding to an act of terrorism, be it evacuation or whatever. Intelligence agencies should be concerned with _preventing_ acts of terrorism. As I said above, the response to an act of terrorism is going to be very similiar to the response for a natural disaster. The same basic needs will apply. --- þ Synchronet þ Eleemosynary ELF - eelf.richardw.net .