Subj : Re: Here's another one
To   : richardw
From : The Lizard Master
Date : Thu Sep 08 2005 02:58 pm

  Re: Re: Here's another one
  By: richardw to The Lizard Master on Thu Sep 08 2005 10:29 am

 >  >  >  >  >  > GUILTY.
 >  >  >  >  >
 >  >  >  >  > So... are you saying he didn't lie under oath?
 >  >  >  >
 >  >  >  > I'm saying he was tried and found not guilty.  She asked why he was
 >  >  >  > different and why the laws not apply to him.
 >  >  >
 >  >  > Perfectly good question IMO.  He was obviously guilty of perjury.
 >  >
 >  > Well then we have to open the scope of why O.J. got off, etc.  The laws d
 >  > apply to him with the standard we seem to have.
 > 
 > At least he lost the civil case, if I recall correctly.
 > 

The burden of evidence is different in that case.

---TLM

---
 þ Synchronet þ Nite Eyes BBS 24/7 Doors/Message Bases/C=64 niteeyes.etowns.net

.